Review of Scientific Instruments
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
In situ testing and calibrating of z-piezo of an atomic force microscope
By scanning a slightly tilted, smooth surface with an atomic force microscope (AFM), it is possible to obtain hysteresis loops which contain information on the nonlinearity and hysteresis in the z axi...
Next Article
An inexpensive STM conversion to a BEEM
Ballistic electron emission microscopy (BEEM) is a relatively new technique enabling spectroscopic investigation of subsurface interface structures and electronic properties. BEEM is a direct, nondama...

Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3789 (1995); doi:10.1063/1.1145439

Issue Date: July 1995

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

John E. Sader
Department of Mathematics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052 Victoria, Australia

Ian Larson and Paul Mulvaney
Department of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052 Victoria, Australia

Lee R. White
Department of Mathematics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052 Victoria, Australia
The determination of the spring constants of atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilevers is of fundamental importance to users of the AFM. In this paper, a fast and nondestructive method for the evaluation of the spring constant which relies solely on the determination of the unloaded resonant frequency of the cantilever, a knowledge of its density or mass, and its dimensions is proposed. This is in contrast to the method of Cleveland et al. [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 403 (1993)], which requires the attachment of masses to the cantilever in the determination of the spring constant. A number of factors which can influence the resonant frequency are examined, in particular (i) gold coating, which can result in a dramatic variation in the resonant frequency, for which a theoretical account is presented and (ii) air damping which, it is found, leads to a shift of ~4% in the resonant frequency down on its value in a vacuum. Furthermore, the point of load on the cantilever is found to be extremely important, since a small variation in the load point can lead to a dramatic variation in the spring constant. Theoretical results that account for this variation, which, it is believed will be of great practical value to the users of the AFM, are given. ©1995 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 2 December 1994; accepted 27 March 1995
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/66/3789/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (1125 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 07.79.Lh
    Instruments, apparatus, components, and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Scanning probe microscopes, components, and techniques Atomic force microscopes
  • YEAR: 1995

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (34)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. E. Meyer, Prog. Surf. Sci. 41, 3 (1992).
  2. S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of Plates and Shells (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959)
  3. J. E. Sader and L. White, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1 (1993).
  4. J. M. Neumeister and W. A. Ducker, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 2527 (1994).
  5. T. R. Albrecht, S. Akamine, T. E. Carver, and C. F. Quate, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 3386 (1990).
  6. K. E. Petersen and C. R. Guarnieri, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 6761 (1979).
  7. T. J. Senden and W. A. Ducker, Langmuir 10, 1003 (1994).
  8. Y. Q. Li, N. J. Tao, J. Pan, A. A. Garcia, and S. M. Lindsay, Langmuir 9, 637 (1993).
  9. J. L. Hutter and J. Bechhoefer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868 (1993).
  10. J. P. Cleveland, S. Manne, D. Bocek, and P. K. Hansma, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 403 (1993).
  11. S. Timoshenko, Vibration Problems in Engineering (Wiley, New York, 1974).
  12. A. W. Leissa, Vibrations of Plates (NASA, Washington, DC, 1969).
  13. PAFEC is a trademark of, and is available from, PAFEC Ltd., Strelley Hall, Main Street, Strelley, Nottingham, NG8 6PE, United Kingdom.
  14. G. K. Batchelor, Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1974).
  15. G. Y. Chen, R. J. Warmack, T. Thundat, D. P. Allison, and A. Huang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 2532 (1994).
  16. U. S. Lindholm, D. D. Kana, W. H. Chu, and H. N. Abramson, J. Ship Res. 9, 11 (1965).
  17. R. J. Roark and W. C. Young, Formulas for Stress and Strain (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).
  18. E. Reissner and M. Stein, N.A.C.A. Tech. Note No. 2369, June 1951.
  19. T. Makino, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 450 (1983).
  20. C. J. Drummond and T. J. Senden, conference submission.
  21. D. T. Atkins and R. M. Pashley, Langmuir 9, 2232 (1993).
  22. I. Larson, C. J. Drummond, D. Y. C. Chan, and F. Grieser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 11885 (1993).
  23. M. W. Rutland and T. J. Senden, Langmuir 9, 412 (1993).
  24. K. F. Roenigk and K. F. Jensen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 1777 (1987).
  25. H. Stein, V. A. Wells, and R. E. Hampy, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 1750 (1979).
  26. W. A. P. Claessen, W. G. J. N. Valkenburg, F. H. P. M. Habraken, and Y. Tamminga, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 2419 (1983).
  27. W. Kern and R. S. Rosler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 1082 (1977).
  28. S. L. Zhang, J. T. Wang, W. Kaplan, and M. Oàstling, Thin Solid Films 213, 182 (1992).
  29. J. Gyulai, O. Meyer, J. W. Mayer, and V. Rodroguez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 232 (1970).
  30. A. K. Sinha and E. Lugujjo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 245 (1978).
  31. H. R. Philipp, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 295 (1973).
  32. D. E. Aspnes and J. B. Theeten, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 4928 (1979).
  33. Park Scientific Instruments, 1171 Borregas Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1304.
  34. M. Tortonese, Park Scientific Instruments (private communication).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.