Review of Scientific Instruments
Feedback | Help | Exit
Review of Scientific Instruments
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Time-resolved stopped-flow x-ray absorption fine structure system using synchrotron radiation for fast reactions in solution
A time-resolved stopped-flow x-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) system was developed using synchrotron radiation as an x-ray source. The shortest sampling time for time-resolved measurements was o...
Next Article
Single molecule spectroscopy in He gas using a highly efficient mirror arrangement
We present a new experimental setup for single molecule spectroscopy using a high efficient mirror arrangement with a geometrical efficiency of 0.77. Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios up to 90 for single p...

Evanescent wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy with a total-internal-reflection minicavity

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 2978 (1997); doi:10.1063/1.1148230

Issue Date: August 1997

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Andrew C. R. Pipino, Jeffrey W. Hudgens, and Robert E. Huie
Physical and Chemical Properties Division, Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
A miniature-cavity realization of the cavity ring-down concept, which permits extension of the technique to spectroscopy of surfaces, thin films, liquids, and, potentially, solids, is explored using a wave-optics model. The novel spectrometer design incorporates a monolithic, total-internal-reflection-ring cavity of regular polygonal geometry with at least one convex facet to induce stability. Evanescent waves generated by total-internal reflection probe absorption by matter in the vicinity of the cavity. Optical radiation enters or exits the resonator by photon tunneling, which permits precise control of input and output coupling. The broadband nature of total-internal reflection circumvents the narrow bandwidth restriction imposed by dielectric mirrors in conventional gas-phase cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Following a general discussion of design criteria, calculations are presented for square and octagonal cavity geometries that quantify intrinsic losses and reveal an optimal cavity size for each geometry. Calculated absorption spectra for the NO3 radical from 450 to 750 nm in a nitric acid solution are presented to demonstrate bandwidth and sensitivity.
History: Received 13 December 1996; accepted 15 May 1997
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/68/2978/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (350 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 07.60.Rd
    Instruments, apparatus, components, and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Optical instruments, equipment, and techniques Visible and ultraviolet spectrometers
  • 42.82.Bq
    Optics Integrated optics Design and performance testing of integrated-optical systems
  • YEAR: 1996-97

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (69)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. O'Keefe and D. A. G. Deacon, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 2544 (1988).
  2. P. Zalicki and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2708 (1995).
  3. K. K. Lehmann and D. Romanini, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10 263 (1996).
  4. J. T. Hodges, J. P. Looney, and R. D. Van Zee, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10 278 (1996).
  5. R. T. Jongma, M. G. H. Boogaarts, I. Holleman, and G. Meijer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2821 (1995).
  6. R. Engeln and G. Meijer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 2708 (1996).
  7. N. J. Brown, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 16, 371 (1986).
  8. E. H. Wahl, T. G. Owano, C. H. Kruger, P. Zalicki, Y. Ma, and R. N. Zare, Diam. Relat. Mater. 5, 373 (1996).
  9. D. Romanini and K. K. Lehmann, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 68 (1996).
  10. J. Pearson, A. J. Orr-wing, M. N. R. Ashfold, and R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 92, 1283 (1996).
  11. P. Zalicki, Y. Ma, R. N. Zare, E. H. Wahl, J. R. Dadamio, T. G. Owano, and C. H. Kruger, Chem. Phys. Lett. 234, 269 (1995).
  12. J. J. Scherer, J. B. Paul, C. P. Collier, and R. J. Saykally, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 5190 (1995).
  13. D. L. Huestis, R. A. Copeland, K. Knutsen, T. G. Slanger, R. T. Jongma, M. G. H. Boogaarts, and G. Meijer, Can. J. Phys. 72, 1109 (1994).
  14. L. Zhu, D. Kellis, and C. F. Ding, Chem. Phys. Lett. 257, 487 (1996).
  15. T. Yu and M. C. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 8599 (1995).
  16. L. Zhu and G. Johnston, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 15 114 (1995).
  17. T. Yu and M. C. Lin, Combust. Flame 100, 169 (1995).
  18. E. W. Diau, T. Yu, M. A. G. Wagner, and M. C. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4043 (1994).
  19. G. Meijer (private communication). Miejer's group has examined the direct extension of CRDS to thin films by judiciously locating a thin, sapphire plate inside a linear cavity. Although a round-trip loss of ~ 10–3 was obtained, they found that the narrow bandwidth of the cavity greatly restricted the useful range of application of this strategy.
  20. A. V. Nurmikko, H. Jeon, R. L. Gunshor, and J. Han, J. Cryst. Growth 159, 644 (1996).
  21. S. Ando, N. Kobayashi, and H. Ando, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2, Lett. 34, 2, Lett. L4 (1995).
  22. S. Schiller and R. L. Byer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 1696 (1993).
  23. K. Fiedler, S. Schiller, R. Paschotta, P. Kürz, and J. Mlynek, Opt. Lett. 18, 1786 (1993).
  24. A. Mekis, J. U. Nöckel, G. Chen, A. D. Stone, and R. K. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2682 (1995).
  25. M. D. Barnes, C-Y. Kung, W. B. Whitten, and J. M. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3931 (1996).
  26. M. D. Barnes, W. B. Whitten, and J. M. Ramsey, Chem. Phys. Lett. 227, 628 (1994).
  27. J. Zhang, D. H. Leach, and R. K. Chang, Opt. Lett. 13, 270 (1988).
  28. J. C. Knight, N. Dubreuil, V. Sandoghdar, J. Hare, V. Lefèvre-Sequin, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Opt. Lett. 12, 698 (1996).
  29. G. Griffel, S. Arnold, D. Taskent, A. Serpengüzel, J. Connolly, and N. Morris, Opt. Lett. 21, 695 (1996).
  30. E. Almaas and I. Brevik, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 2429 (1995).
  31. M. L. Gorodetsky and V. S. Ilchenko, Opt. Commun. 113, 133 (1994).
  32. J. J. Regan and D. R. Andersen, Comput. Phys. 49, 49 (1991).
  33. N. J. Harrick, Internal Reflection Spectroscopy (Interscience, New York, 1967).
  34. N. J. Harrick and F. K. Du Pré, Appl. Opt. 5, 1739 (1966).
  35. S. Schiller, I. I. Yu, M. M. Fejer, and R. L. Byer, Opt. Lett. 17, 378 (1992).
  36. A. C. R. Pipino, J. W. Hudgens, and R. E. Huie, Chem. Phys. Lett. (in press).
  37. R. D. Maurer, Proc. IEEE 61, 452 (1973).
  38. Optical Properties of Highly Transparent Solids, Waterville Valley, N.H., edited by S. S. Mitra and B. Bendow (Plenum, New York, 1975).
  39. P. Beckmann and A. Spizzichino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces (Pergamon, New York, 1963).
  40. H. Hogrefe and C. Funz, Appl. Opt. 26, 2851 (1987).
  41. S. Schiller, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1993.
  42. X. Wang, G. Hu, Y. Li, and J. Yao, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2265 (1994).
  43. K. K. Li, Appl. Opt. 21, 967 (1982).
  44. K. K. Li, A. Dienes, and J. R. Whinnery, Appl. Opt. 20, 407 (1981).
  45. W. W. Rigrod, Bell Syst. Tech. J. May, 907 (1965).
  46. H. Kogelnik and T. Li, Proc. IEEE 54, 1312 (1966).
  47. A. G. Fox and T. Li, Bell Syst. Tech. J. March, 453 (1961).
  48. A. E. Seigman, Lasers (University Science Books, Mills Valley, CA, 1986).
  49. J. J. Scherer, D. Voelkel, D. J. Rakestraw, J. B. Paul, C. P. Collier, R. J. Saykally, and A. O'Keefe, Chem. Phys. Lett. 245, 273 (1995).
  50. G. Meijer, M. G. H. Boogaarts, R. T. Jongma, and D. H. Parker, Chem. Phys. Lett. 217, 112 (1994).
  51. J. W. Strutt, Philos. Mag. 5.6 20, 1001 (1910).
  52. G. Meijer and R. Engeln, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 105 (1996).
  53. D. Romanini, A. A. Kacchanov, and F. Stoeckel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 264, 316 (1997).
  54. B. A. Paldus, J. S. Harris, J. Martin, J. Xie, and R. N. Zare, J. Appl. Phys. (in press).
  55. G. Rempe, R. J. Thompson, H. J. Kimble, and R. Lalezari, Opt. Lett. 17, 363 (1992).
  56. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  57. A. K. Ghatak and K. Thyagarajan, Contemporary Optics (Plenum, New York, 1978), p. 331.
  58. A. K. Ghatak, M. R. Shenoy, I. C. Goyal, and K. Thyagarajan, Opt. Commun. 56, 313 (1986).
  59. F. Falco and T. Tamir, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 185 (1990).
  60. W. Nasalski, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 172 (1995).
  61. K. Ohta and H. Ishida, Appl. Opt. 29, 1952 (1990).
  62. I. N. Court and F. K. Von Willisem, Appl. Opt. 3, 719 (1964).
  63. G. Lawrence, Applied Optics and Optical Engineering (Academic, New York, 1992), Vol. 11, p. 168. The GLAD code required modification to permit photon tunneling, evanescent wave absorption, and utilization of a global coordinate system for the general polygonal ring resonator model. Note that identification of specific commercial products in this paper is provided in order to specify procedures completely. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that such products have necessarily been identified as the best available for the purpose.
  64. F. D. Feiock, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 485 (1978).
  65. F. Bayer-Helms, Appl. Opt. 23, 1369 (1984).
  66. D. Clarke and J. F. Grainger, Polarized Light and Optical Measurement (Pergamon, New York, 1971), p. 57.
  67. P. Neta and R. E. Huie, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 4644 (1986).
  68. P. H. Wine, R. L. Mauldin III, and R. P. Thorn, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 1156 (1988).
  69. W. N. Hansen, Spectrochim. Acta 21, 815 (1965).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics