New electron cyclotron emission diagnostic for measurement of temperature based upon the electron Bernstein wave
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 1018 (1999); doi:10.1063/1.1149464
Issue Date: January 1999
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Most magnetically confined plasma devices cannot take advantage of standard electron cyclotron emission (ECE) diagnostics to measure temperature. They either operate at high density relative to their magnetic field (e.g.,
p
c in spherical tokamaks) or they do not have sufficient density and temperature to reach the blackbody condition (
> 2). The standard ECE technique measures the electromagnetic waves emanating from the plasma. Here we propose to measure electron Bernstein waves (EBW) to ascertain the local electron temperature in these plasmas. The optical thickness of EBW is extremely high because it is an electrostatic wave with a large ki. For example, the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) will have an optical thickness 
3000 and CDX-U will have 
300. One can reach the blackbody condition with a plasma density
1011 cm 3 and Te
1 eV. This makes it attractive to most plasma devices. The serious issue with using EBW is the wave accessibility for the emission measurement. Simple accessibility arguments indicate the wave may be accessible by either direct coupling or mode conversion through an extremely narrow layer (
12 mm). EBW experiments on the Current Drive Experiment-Upgrade (CDX-U) will test the accessibility properties of the spherical tokamak configuration. ©1999 American Institute of Physics.
p
c in spherical tokamaks) or they do not have sufficient density and temperature to reach the blackbody condition (
> 2). The standard ECE technique measures the electromagnetic waves emanating from the plasma. Here we propose to measure electron Bernstein waves (EBW) to ascertain the local electron temperature in these plasmas. The optical thickness of EBW is extremely high because it is an electrostatic wave with a large ki. For example, the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) will have an optical thickness 
3000 and CDX-U will have 
300. One can reach the blackbody condition with a plasma density
1011 cm 3 and Te
1 eV. This makes it attractive to most plasma devices. The serious issue with using EBW is the wave accessibility for the emission measurement. Simple accessibility arguments indicate the wave may be accessible by either direct coupling or mode conversion through an extremely narrow layer (
12 mm). EBW experiments on the Current Drive Experiment-Upgrade (CDX-U) will test the accessibility properties of the spherical tokamak configuration. ©1999 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Presented 10 June 1998 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/70/1018/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
PLASMA WAVES,
PLASMA DIAGNOSTICS,
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT,
RADIOMETERS,
MAGNETIC FIELDS,
BERNSTEIN MODE,
radiometry,
plasma temperature,
plasma Bernstein waves,
plasma toroidal confinement
- 52.70.Gw
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma diagnostic techniques and instrumentation Radio-frequency and microwave measurements - 52.35.Hr
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Waves, oscillations, and instabilities in plasma Electromagnetic waves (e.g., electron-cyclotron, Whistler, Bernstein, upper hybrid, lower hybrid) - 52.55.Fa
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Tokamaks - 52.55.Pi
Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Fusion products effects (e.g., alpha-particles, etc.) - 07.57.Kp
Instruments, apparatus, components, and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Infrared, submillimeter wave, microwave and radiowave instruments, equipment and techniques Bolometers; infrared, submillimeter wave, microwave, and radiowave receivers and detectors - YEAR: 1999
PUBLICATION DATA
0034-6748 (print)
1089-7623 (online)
REFERENCES (12)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- M. Bornatici et al.,
Nucl. Fusion 23, 1153 (1983) . - H. J. Hartfuss et al.,
Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 39, 1693 (1997) . - A. E. Costley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 758 (1974).
- D. A. Gates et al., Phys. Plasmas 5, 1775 (1998).
- J. Spitzer et al.,
Fusion Technol. 30, 1337 (1996) . - J. Hosea, V. Arunasalam, and R. Cano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 408 (1977).
- G. Bekefi, Radiation Processes in a Plasma (Wiley, New York, 1966).
- T. H. Stix, The Theory of Plasma Waves (McGrawHill, New York, 1962).
- S. Bernabei et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 866 (1975).
- K. C. Wu, A. K. Ram, and A. Bers, Proc. Am. Phys. Soc. 41, 1425 (1996).
- H. P. Laqua et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3467 (1997).
- M. Ono et al., Princeton Plasma Physics Lab Report No. 3225, 1997 (unpublished).







