Review of Scientific Instruments
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Phase contrast imaging interferometer for edge density fluctuation measurements on LHD
A phase contrast interferometer employing a CO2 laser (wavelength i = 10.6 µm) is designed and installed in order to study density fluctuations on a large helical device. A 250×50 mm slab ...
Next Article
Collective Thomson scattering based on CO2 laser for ion energy spectrum measurements in JT-60U
A collective Thomson scattering (CTS) diagnostic system based on a pulsed CO2 laser has been developed and brought into operation to establish a measurement technique for ion temperature and the energ...

CO2 laser imaging interferometer for high spatial resolution electron density profile measurements on LHD

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 1638 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1532759

Issue Date: March 2003

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

T. Akiyama
Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-2 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan

K. Tanaka
National Institute of Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki-shi, Gifu 509-5292, Japan

L. N. Vyacheslavov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia

A. Sanin, T. Tokuzawa, and Y. Ito
National Institute of Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki-shi, Gifu 509-5292, Japan

S. Tsuji-Iio
Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-2 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan

S. Okajima
Chubu University, Matsumoto-cho, Kasugai-shi, Aichi 487-8501, Japan

K. Kawahata
National Institute of Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki-shi, Gifu 509-5292, Japan
A CO2 laser (lambda= 10.6 µm) imaging interferometer was developed for detailed and precise electron density profile measurements and was installed on the large helical device in 2001. A CO2 laser is adopted to avoid fringe loss due to the short wavelength. An imaging scheme is employed that uses three slab-like beams and multichannel detector arrays to measure with fine spatial resolution. As an initial trial we used one slab-like beam that passes through the plasma edge. Phase distributions were measured without fringe loss even after pellet injection. Density profiles can be obtained by the slice and stack method with a spatial resolution of 16 mm (about 3% of the plasma minor radius). The electron density was found to rise to about 6×1019 m–3 just after pellet injection even near the last closed flux surface. Mechanical vibration effects would be negligible in such a case. A bench top experiment of a coaxial YAG laser (lambda= 1.06 µm) interferometer for vibration compensation was carried out. ©2003 American Institute of Physics.
History: Presented 8 July 2002
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/74/1638/1

Submit to JRSE

BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (89 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 52.70.Kz
    Optical (ultraviolet, visible, infrared) plasma diagnostic measurements
  • 52.55.Hc
    Stellarators, torsatrons, heliacs, bumpy tori, and other toroidal confinement devices
  • 28.52.Lf
    Fusion reactor components and instrumentation
  • 07.60.Ly
    Optical interferometers
  • 42.55.Lt
    Gas lasers including excimer and metal-vapor lasers
  • YEAR: 2003

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (11)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. K. Kawahata, K. Tanaka, Y. Ito, A. Ejiri, and S. Okajima, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 707 (1999).
  2. K. Kawahata, K. Tanaka, T. Tokuzawa, Y. Ito, A. Ejiri, S. Okajima, and LHD Experimental Group, Proceedings of the 28th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, ECA 2001, Vol. 25A, pp. 437–440.
  3. D. Veron, Infrared and Millimeter Waves (Academic, New York, 1979), Vol. 2, pp. 69–135.
  4. C. A. J. Hugenholz and B. J. H. Meddens, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 171 (1982).
  5. E. J. Doyle, J. Howard, W. H. Peebles, and N. C. Luhmann, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1945 (1986).
  6. K. Hattori et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 2857 (1991).
  7. L. N. Vyacheslavov, K. Tanala, and K. Kawahata, NIFS Report No. 694 (2001).
  8. K. Tanaka, L. N. Vyacheslavov, T. Akiyama, A. Sanin, K. Kawahata, T. Tokuzawa, Y. Ito, S. Tsuji-iio, and S. Okajima, Rev. Sci. Instrum. (these proceedings).
  9. Focus Software, Incorporated.
  10. D. W. Choi, E. J. Powers, R. D. Bengtson, G. Joyce, D. L. Brower, N. C. Luhmann, Jr., and W. A. Peebles, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1989 (1986).
  11. Y. Jiang, D. L. Brower, L. Zeng, and J. Howard, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 902 (1997).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.