Review of Scientific Instruments
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Combining magnetic resonance imaging and ultrawideband radar: A new concept for multimodal biomedical imaging
Due to the recent advances in ultrawideband (UWB) radar technologies, there has been widespread interest in the medical applications of this technology. We propose the multimodal combination of magnet...
Next Article
A lightweight balloon-carried cloud charge sensor
Despite the importance of microphysical cloud processes on the climate system, some topics are under-explored. For example, few measurements of droplet charges in nonthunderstorm clouds exist. Balloon...

Measurements of accurate x-ray scattering data of protein solutions using small stationary sample cells

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 014303 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3069285

Published 21 January 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Xinguo Hong and Quan Hao
MacCHESS, Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
In this paper, we report a method of precise in situ x-ray scattering measurements on protein solutions using small stationary sample cells. Although reduction in the radiation damage induced by intense synchrotron radiation sources is indispensable for the correct interpretation of scattering data, there is still a lack of effective methods to overcome radiation-induced aggregation and extract scattering profiles free from chemical or structural damage. It is found that radiation-induced aggregation mainly begins on the surface of the sample cell and grows along the beam path; the diameter of the damaged region is comparable to the x-ray beam size. Radiation-induced aggregation can be effectively avoided by using a two-dimensional scan (2D mode), with an interval as small as 1.5 times the beam size, at low temperature (e.g., 4 °C). A radiation sensitive protein, bovine hemoglobin, was used to test the method. A standard deviation of less than 5% in the small angle region was observed from a series of nine spectra recorded in 2D mode, in contrast to the intensity variation seen using the conventional stationary technique, which can exceed 100%. Wide-angle x-ray scattering data were collected at a standard macromolecular diffraction station using the same data collection protocol and showed a good signal/noise ratio (better than the reported data on the same protein using a flow cell). The results indicate that this method is an effective approach for obtaining precise measurements of protein solution scattering. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 15 October 2008; accepted 17 December 2008; published 21 January 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/80/014303/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (496 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 87.64.Bx
    Electron, neutron and X-ray diffraction and scattering in biophysics and medical physics
  • 87.14.E-
    Proteins
  • 87.80.Un
    Proteomic techniques (biophysical research methods)
  • 87.15.nr
    Aggregation in biological macromolecular solutions
  • 87.15.B-
    Structure of biomolecules
  • 36.20.Hb
    Macromolecular configuration (bonds, dimensions)
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (30)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. J. Trewhella, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 702 (1997).
  2. M. H. J. Koch, P. Vachette, and D. I. Svergun, Q. Rev. Biophys. 36, 147 (2003).
  3. J. Grossmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, s217 (2007).
  4. R. B. Ravelli and S. M. McSweeney, Structure (London) 8, 315 (2000).
  5. P. O'Neill, D. L. Stevens, and E. F. Garman, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 9, 329 (2002).
  6. J. Murray and E. Garman, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 9, 347 (2002).
  7. T. -Y. Teng and K. Moffat, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 7, 313 (2000).
  8. T. -Y. Teng and K. Moffat, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 9, 198 (2002).
  9. J. R. Helliwell, J. Cryst. Growth 90, 259 (1988).
  10. W. Burmeister, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 56, 328 (2000).
  11. M. Weik, R. B. G. Ravelli, G. Kryger, S. McSweeney, M. L. Raves, M. Harel, P. Gros, I. Silman, J. Kroon, and J. L. Sussman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 623 (2000).
  12. Q. Hao, F. E. Dodd, J. G. Grossmann, and S. S. Hasnain, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 243 (1999).
  13. Q. Hao, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 909 (2006).
  14. R. F. Fischetti, D. J. Rodi, A. Mirza, T. C. Irving, E. Kondrashkina, and L. Makowski, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 10, 398 (2003).
  15. J. Lipfert, I. S. Millett, S. Seifert, and S. Doniach, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 046108 (2006).
  16. S. Kuwamoto, S. Akiyama, and T. Fujisawa, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 462 (2004).
  17. N. Ando, P. Chenevier, M. Novak et al., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 167 (2008).
  18. J. Israelachvili and H. Wennerstrom, Nature (London) 379, 219 (1996).
  19. T. C. Huang, H. Toraya, T. N. Blanton, and Y. Wu, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 180 (1993).
  20. T. N. Blanton, T. C. Huang, H. Toraya, C. R. Hubbard, S. B. Robie, D. Louer, H. E. Goebel, G. Will, R. Gilles, and T. Raftery, Powder Diffr. 10, 91 (1995).
  21. A. P. Hammersley, S. O. Svensson, M. Hanfland, A. N. Fitch, and D. Hausermann, High Press. Res. 14, 235 (1996).
  22. T. -H. Lu, K. Panneerselvam, Y. -C. Liaw, P. Kan, and C. -J. Lee, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 56, 304 (2000).
  23. Z. Otwinowski, W. Minor, and C. W. Carter, Jr., Methods in Enzymology (Academic, New York, 1997), Vol. 276, p. 307.
  24. W. M. Garrison, Chem. Rev. 87, 381 (1987).
  25. A. G. Guinier and G. Fournet, Small Angle Scattering X-rays (Wiley, New York, 1955).
  26. G. Porod, Small Angle X-ray Scattering (Academic, London, 1982).
  27. Y. Izumi, S. Kuwamoto, Y. Jinbo, and H. Yoshino, FEBS Lett. 495, 126 (2001).
  28. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760 (1994).
  29. T. C. Mueser, P. H. Rogers, and A. Arnone, Biochemistry 39, 15353 (2000).
  30. D. Svergun, C. Barberato, and M. H. J. Koch, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 768 (1995).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.