Review of Scientific Instruments
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Construction of an integrated Raman- and angular-scattering microscope
We report on the construction of a multimodal microscope platform capable of gathering both elastically and inelastically scattered light from a 38  µm2 region in both epi- and transil...
Next Article
Microwave phase detection at the level of 10−11  rad
We report on a noise measurement system with the highest spectral resolution ever achieved in the microwave domain. It is capable of detecting the phase fluctuations in rms amplitude of 2×10&min...

Autonomous low-power magnetic data collection platform to enable remote high latitude array deployment

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 044501 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3108527

Published 20 April 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Stephen B. Musko,1 C. Robert Clauer,2 Aaron J. Ridley,1 and Kennneth L. Arnett1
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
2Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

A major driver in the advancement of geophysical sciences is improvement in the quality and resolution of data for use in scientific analysis, discovery, and for assimilation into or validation of empirical and physical models. The need for more and better measurements together with improvements in technical capabilities is driving the ambition to deploy arrays of autonomous geophysical instrument platforms in remote regions. This is particularly true in the southern polar regions where measurements are presently sparse due to the remoteness, lack of infrastructure, and harshness of the environment. The need for the acquisition of continuous long-term data from remote polar locations exists across geophysical disciplines and is a generic infrastructure problem. The infrastructure, however, to support autonomous instrument platforms in polar environments is still in the early stages of development. We report here the development of an autonomous low-power magnetic variation data collection system. Following 2 years of field testing at the south pole station, the system is being reproduced to establish a dense chain of stations on the Antarctic plateau along the 40° magnetic meridian. The system is designed to operate for at least 5 years unattended and to provide data access via satellite communication. The system will store 1 s measurements of the magnetic field variation (<0.2  nT resolution) in three vector components plus a variety of engineering status and environment parameters. We believe that the data collection platform can be utilized by a variety of low-power instruments designed for low-temperature operation. The design, technical characteristics, and operation results are presented here. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 14 November 2008; accepted 7 March 2009; published 20 April 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/80/044501/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (2166 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 93.85.Jk
    Magnetic and electrical methods (geophysical instruments and techniques)
  • 91.25.ga
    Spatial geomagnetic variations: all harmonics and anomalies
  • 93.30.Ca
    Antarctica
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (18)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. Information available on the web at http://www.sos.siena.edu/antarctic/PENGUIn_Program/.
  2. Information available on the web at http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/instruments/lpm.php.
  3. C. Clauer, in Physical Signatures of Magnetospheric Boundary Layer Processes, edited by J. A. Holtet and A. Egeland (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1994), pp. 29–41.
  4. C. R. Clauer, P. Stauning, T. J. Rosenberg, E. Friis-Christensen, R. Sitar, and P. Miller, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 7697 (1995).
  5. C. R. Clauer and A. J. Ridley, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 21873 (1995).
  6. M. L. Cooper, C. R. Clauer, B. A. Emery, A. D. Richmond, and J. D. Winningham, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 19329 (1995).
  7. A. J. Ridley and C. R. Clauer, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 10919 (1996).
  8. V. O. Papitashvili, C. R. Clauer, S. Musko, B. A. Belov, O. A. Troshichev, and M. G. Gudkov, Antarct. J. US. 31, 255 (1996).
  9. C. R. Clauer, A. J. Ridley, R. J. Sitar, H. J. Singer, A. S. Rodger, E. Friis-Christensen, and V. O. Papitashvili, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 4585 (1997).
  10. A. J. Ridley, C. R. Clauer, G. Lu, and V. O. Papitashvili, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 14,563 (1997).
  11. R. J. Sitar, J. B. Baker, C. R. Clauer, A. J. Ridley, J. A. Cumnock, V. O. Papitashvili, J. Spann, M. J. Brittnacher, and G. K. Parks, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 23,357 (1998).
  12. A. J. Ridley, G. Lu, C. R. Clauer, and V. O. Papitashvili, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 4023 (1998).
  13. A. J. Ridley, T. Moretto, P. Ernström, and C. R. Clauer, J. Geophys. Res 103, 26349 (1998).
  14. R. J. Sitar and C. R. Clauer, J. Geophys. Res 104, 28,343 (1999).
  15. T. Moretto, A. Ridley, M. J. Engebretson, and O. Rasmussen, J. Geophys. Res 105, 2521 (2000).
  16. A. J. Ridley, G. Crowley, and C. Freitas, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3675 (2000).
  17. V. O. Papitashvili, C. R. Clauer, F. Christiansen, V. A. Pilipenko, V. A. Popov, O. Rasmussen, V. P. Suchdeo, and J. F. Watermann, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3785 (2000).
  18. M. H. Acuña, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 3717 (2002).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.