Review of Scientific Instruments
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Design, construction, and calibration of a three-axis, high-frequency magnetic probe (B-dot probe) as a diagnostic for exploding plasmas
A three-axis, 2.5 mm overall diameter differential magnetic probe (also known as B-dot probe) is discussed in detail from its design and construction to its calibration and use as diagnostic of fast t...
Next Article
Development of a surface conductivity measurement system for ultrahigh vacuum transmission electron microscope
The surface conductivity measurement system using a micro-four-point probe (M4PP) had been developed for the ultrahigh vacuum transmission electron microscope (UHV-TEM). Since the current distribution...

Improvement of windowed type environmental-cell transmission electron microscope for in situ observation of gas-solid interactions

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 113701 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3250862

Published 2 November 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Tadahiro Kawasaki,1,2 Kouta Ueda,1 Mikio Ichihashi,3 and Takayoshi Tanji3
1Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
2PRESTO-JST, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
3EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

We have developed an improved, windowed type environmental-cell (E-cell) transmission electron microscope (TEM) for in situ observation of gas-solid interactions, such as catalytic reactions at atmospheric pressure. Our E-cell TEM includes a compact E-cell specimen holder with mechanical stability, resulting in smoother introduction of the desired gases compared with previous E-cell TEMs. In addition, the gas control unit was simplified by omitting the pressure control function of the TEM pre-evacuation chamber. This simplification was due to the successful development of remarkably tough thin carbon films as the window material. These films, with a thickness of <10  nm, were found to withstand pressure differences >2  atm. Appropriate arrangement of the specimen position inside the E-cell provided quantitatively analyzable TEM images, with no disturbances caused by the windowed films. As an application, we used this E-cell TEM to observe the dynamic shape change in a catalytic gold nanoparticle supported on TiO2 during the oxidation of CO gas. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 30 July 2009; accepted 25 September 2009; published 2 November 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?RSINAK/80/113701/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (710 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 07.78.+s
    Electron, positron, and ion microscopes; electron diffractometers
  • 82.65.+r
    Surface and interface chemistry; heterogeneous catalysis at surfaces
  • 81.65.Mq
    Surface oxidation
  • 61.46.Df
    Structure of nanocrystals and nanoparticles
  • 68.55.aj
    Insulator thin film nucleation and growth
  • YEAR: 2009

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0034-6748 (print)   1089-7623 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (23)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. H. Hashimoto, J. Elect. Microsc. 9, 130 (1960).
  2. H. G. Heide, Naturwiss. 47, 313 (1960).
  3. H. G. Heide, J. Cell Biol. 13, 147 (1962).
  4. A. Fukami, K. Fukushima, A. Ishikawa, and K. Ohi, Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscope Society of America, 1987 (unpublished), p. 142.
  5. A. Ishikawa, K. Fukushima, and A. Fukami, J. Elect. Microsc. 38, 316 (1989).
  6. R. Sharma, Microsc. Microanal. 7, 494 (2001).
  7. P. A. Crozier, R. Wang, and R. Sharma, Ultramicroscopy 108, 1432 (2008).
  8. P. L. Gai, Top. Catal. 21, 161 (2002).
  9. P. L. Gai and E. D. Boyes, Microsc. Res. Tech. 72, 153 (2009).
  10. P. L. Hansen, J. B. Wagner, S. Helveg, J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, B. S. Clausen, and H. Topsoe, Science 295, 2053 (2002).
  11. H. Yoshida and S. Takeda, Phys. Rev. B 72, 195428 (2005).
  12. T. L. Daulton, B. J. Little, K. Lowe, and J. Jones-Meehan, Microsc. Microanal. 7, 470 (2001).
  13. S. Giorgio, S. S. Joao, S. Nitsche, D. Chaudanson, G. Sitja, and C. R. Henry, Ultramicroscopy 106, 503 (2006).
  14. J. F. Creemer, S. Helveg, G. H. Hoveling, S. Ullmann, A. M. Molenbroek, P. M. Sarro, and H. W. Zandbergen, Ultramicroscopy 108, 993 (2008).
  15. K. Ueda, T. Kawasaki, H. Hasegawa, T. Tanji, and M. Ichihashi, Surf. Interface Anal. 40, 1725 (2008).
  16. A. Watabe, T. Kamino, N. Yaguchi, M. Kimata, and A. Yoshida, Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Microscopy, 2009 (unpublished), p. 37.
  17. M. Haruta, N. Yamada, T. Kobayashi, and S. Iijima, J. Catal. 115, 301 (1989).
  18. M. Haruta, Gold Bull. 37, 27 (2004).
  19. T. Akita, M. Okumura, K. Tanaka, K. Ohkuma, M. Kohyama, T. Koyanagi, M. Date, S. Tsubota, and M. Haruta, Surf. Interface Anal. 37, 265 (2005).
  20. N. Shibata, A. Goto, K. Matsunaga, T. Mizoguchi, S. D. Findlay, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Ikuhara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136105 (2009).
  21. T. Kawasaki, Y. Takai, and R. Shimizu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3509 (2001).
  22. T. Kawasaki and Y. Takai, Surf. Interface Anal. 35, 51 (2003).
  23. S. Tsubota, M. Haruta, T. Kobayashi, A. Ueda, and Y. Nakahara, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 63, 695 (1991).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.