You are logged in to this journal.
Analysis Still Matters: A Surprising Instance of Failure of Runge--Kutta--Felberg ODE Solvers
SIAM Rev. Volume 46, Issue 4, pp. 729-737 (2004)
Issue Date: 2004This paper provides a nice example to illustrate that without supporting analysis, a numerical simulation may lead to incorrect conclusions. We explore a pedagogical example of failure of Runge--Kutta--Felberg (RKF) algorithms for a simple dynamical system that models the coupling of two oscillators. Although the system appears to be well-behaved, the explicit RKF solvers provide erratic numerical solutions. The mode of failure is based in a period-doubling route to chaos due to the existence of stable linear solutions in the problem.
©2004 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics| Permalink: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342911X |
KEYWORDS and AMS
PUBLICATION DATA
REFERENCES (4)
-
Cheng Wang, Convergence analysis of the numerical method for the primitive equations formulated in mean vorticity on a Cartesian grid, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 4 (2004), 1143–1172
-
S. Hammel, J. Yorke, and C. Gregobi, Do numerical orbits of chaotic dynamical processes represent true orbits?, J. Complexity, 3 (1987), pp. 136–145.
-
Christopher Zarowski, An introduction to numerical analysis for electrical and computer engineers, Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], 2004xvi+586 [MathRev]
-
S. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA, 1994.




