Effect of optical feedback to the ground and excited state emission of a passively mode locked quantum dot laser
Source: Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 061114 (2010); doi:10.1063/1.3477955
Published 13 August 2010
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
We present an experimental study on the effect of optical feedback in both ground and excited emission of a GaAs quantum dot passively mode locked laser. The experimental setup consisted of a long external cavity with variable cavity length and feedback level ranging from –50 to –20dB. The obtained experimental results show dependence of the emission properties on the cavity length regarding both the ground and excited state. In addition a strong tolerance of the laser operation to feedback at the excited state operation regime is observed.
©2010 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 29 June 2010; accepted 20 July 2010; published 13 August 2010 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/97/061114/1 |
REFERENCES (16)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- E. U. Rafailov, M. A. Cataluna, and W. Sibbett,
Nat. Photonics 1, 395 (2007) . - A. R. Rae, M. G. Thompson, A. R. Kovsh, R. V. Penty, and I. H. White, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 12, 307 (2005).
- M. A. Cataluna, W. Sibbet, D. A. Livshits, J. Weimert, A. R. Kovsh, E. U. Rafailov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 081124 (2006).
- M. Sugawara, N. Hatori, H. Ebe, M. Ishida, Y. Arakawa, T. Akiyama, K. Otsubo, and Y. Nakata, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 043523 (2005).
- H. S. Djie, B. S. Ooi, X. M. Fang, Y. Wu, J. M. Fastenau, W. K. Liu, and M. Hopkinson,
Opt. Lett. 32, 44 (2007) . - R. P. Prasankumar, R. S. Attaluri, R. D. Averitt, J. Urayama, N. Weisse-Bernstein, P. Rotella, A. D. Stintz, S. Krishna, and A. J. Taylor,
Opt. Express 16, 1165 (2008) . - J. Oksanen and J. Tulkki, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 1983 (2003).
- O. Carroll, I. Driscol, S. P. Hegarty, G. Huyet, J. Houlihan, E. A. Viktorov, and P. Mandel,
Opt. Express 14, 10831 (2006) . - H. Su, L. Zhang, A. L. Gray, R. Wang, T. C. Newell, K. J. Malloy, and L. F. Lester,
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 15, 1504 (2003) . - M. Passerini, G. Giuliani, and M. Sorel,
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17, 965 (2005) . - E. A. Avrutin, S. Xibin, and B. M. Russel,
Opt. Quantum Electron. 40, 1175 (2008) . - F. Grillot, C. Y. Lin, N. A. Naderi, M. Pochet, and L. F. Lester, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 153503 (2009).
- C. Y. Lin, F. Grillot, N. A. Naderi, Y. Li, and L. F. Lester, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 051118 (2010).
- B. V. Volovik, A. F. Tsatsulnikov, D. A. Bedarev, A. Yu. Egorov, A. E. Zhukov, A. R. Kovsh, N. N. Ledentsov, M. V. Maksimov, N. A. Maleev, Yu. G. Musikhin, A. A. Suvorova, V. M. Ustinov, P. S. Kopev, Zh. I. Alferov, D. Bimberg, and P. Werner,
J. Semicond. 33, 901 (1999) . - C. Hönninger, R. Paschotta, F. Morier-Genoud, M. Moser, and U. Keller,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 46 (1999) . - A. A. Ukhanov, A. Stintz, P. G. Eliseev, and K. J. Malloy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1058 (2004).
ADVERTISEMENT


