Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse
Previous Article Next Article

The Sonochemical and Biological Effects of Three Clinically-Used Contrast Agents

Source: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 07HF23 (2010); doi:10.1143/JJAP.49.07HF23

Issue Date: 1 August 2010

PUBLICATION DATA
ISSN:
1553-9628 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef JSAP
Mariame A. Hassan
Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt


Loreto B. Feril
Department of Anatomy, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

Nobuki Kudo
Laboratory of Biomedical Instrumentation and Measurements, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan

Katsuro Tachibana
Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt

Takashi Kondo
Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan

Peter Riesz
Radiation Biology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1002, U.S.A.
The encapsulation of gas bubbles has resulted in improved stability and added a binding capacity to shells for ultrasound-guided targeted delivery. However, this has also changed the physical and acoustical properties of the final formulation. In this study, we have evaluated three clinically-used contrast agents of different compositions, namely, Levovist, Sonazoid, and SonoVue, with respect to their sonochemical and biological effects at different concentrations. The results showed that both shell elasticity and reactivity played a role in modulating both effects influencing the extent of ultrasound-induced free-radical formation. Microbubbles with elastic shells were found to be more capable of inducing delayed symptoms of cell killing, whereas the combined use of chemically reactive robust shells and high-density gases, such as perfluorocarbons, could exert a protective effect on cells. These conclusions offer new perspectives on how microbubbles interact with biological systems and might be useful in tailoring novel microbubbles in the future. ©2010

(As supplied by publisher.)

ADVERTISEMENT