Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse
Previous Article Next Article

Study of back-scattering microspectrum for stomach cells at single-cell scale

Source: J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 040505 (2010); doi:10.1117/1.3469782

Published 11 August 2010

KEYWORDS and PACS
Keywords
PACS
  • 87.64.Cc
    Scattering of visible, uv, and infrared radiation (spectroscopic/microscopic techniques in biophysics/medical physics)
  • 87.19.xj
    Cancer
  • 87.64.M-
    Optical microscopy in biophysics and medical physics
  • YEAR: 2010
PUBLICATION DATA
ISSN:
1553-9628 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef SPIE
Cheng Wang,1 Xudong Guo,1 Baoying Fang,2 and Chengli Song1
1University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, Shanghai, China
2University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shanghai, China

A fiber confocal backscattering (FCBS) spectrometer is developed based on fiber confocal microscopy and light scattering theory. The FCBS spectrometer can provide imaging and spectral information simultaneously at the cellular scale. Normal stomach epithelial cell line GES-1 and cancerous cell line NCI-N87 are measured and their spectral results show that backscattering intensity from NCI-N87 cells is stronger than that from GES-1 cells in 500  to  800  nm, and the GES-1 cells scattering spectra show regular intensity changes, while the NCI-N87 cells do not. The experiments prove that the FCBS spectrometer is able to distinguish cancerous cells from normal stomach cells at the cellular level. The spectrometer could be further developed into a noninvasive optical technology for early cancer detection. ©2010 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
History: Received 24 December 2009; revised 21 June 2010; accepted 1 July 2010; published 11 August 2010
Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3469782

REFERENCES (20)

  1. V. Backman, M. B. Wallace, L. T. Pereleman, J. T. Arendt, and M. S. Feld, “Detection of preinvasive cancer cells,” Nature 406(6), 35–36 (2000). [MEDLINE]
  2. J. R. Mourant, M. Canpolat, C. Brocker, and J. P. Freyer, “Light scattering from cells: the contribution of the nucleus and the effects of proliferative status,” J. Biomed. Opt. 5(2), 131–137 (2000). [MEDLINE]
  3. J. R. Mourant, J. P. Freyer, A. H. Heilscher, A. A. Eick, D. Shen, and T. M. Johnson, “Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-tissue diagnostics,” Appl. Opt. 37(16), 3586–3593 (1998). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  4. R. Drezek, M. Guillaud, C. Thomas, I. Boiko, and R. R. Kortum, “Light scattering from cervical cells throughout neoplastic progression: influence of nucleus morphology, DNA content, and chromatin texture,” J. Biomed. Opt. 8(1), 7–16 (2003). [MEDLINE]
  5. J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging,” Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1361–1367 (2003). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  6. L. Lovat and S. Bown, “Elastic scattering spectroscopy for detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus,” Gastrointest Endosc Clin. N. Am. 14(3), 507–517 (2004). [MEDLINE]
  7. P. J. Dwyer, C. A. Dimarzio, J. M. Zavislan, W. J. Fox, and M. Rajadhyaksha, “Confocal reflectance theta line scanning microscope for imaging human skin in vivo,” Opt. Lett. 31, 942–944 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  8. T. Perelman Lev, Z. George, V. Backman, R. Gurjar, and M. S. Feld, “Quantitative analysis of mucosal tissues in patients using light scattering spectroscopy,” Proc. SPIE 3597, 474–479 (1999).
  9. R. S. Gurjar, V. Backman, L. T. Perelman, I. Georgakoudi, and M. S. Feld, “Imaging human epithelial properties with polarized light scattering spectroscopy,” Nat. Med. 7(11), 1245–1248 (2001). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  10. I. Georgakoudi, B. C. Jacobson, J. V. Dam, V. Backman, and M. S. Feld, “Reflectance and light-scattering spectroscopy for evaluating dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus,” Gastroenterology 120, 1620–1629 (2001). [MEDLINE]
  11. T. T. Wu and J. Y. Qu, “Assessment of the relative contribution of cellular components to the acetowhitening effect in cell culture and suspensions using elastic light-scattering spectroscopy,” Appl. Opt. 46(21/20), 4834–4842 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  12. Y. Liu, X. Li, Y. L. Kim, and V. Backman, “Elastic backscattering spectroscopic microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 30(18), 2445–2447 (2005). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  13. H. Fang, L. Qiu, E. Vitkin, M. M. Zaman, L. T. Perelman, “Confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopic microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 46(10), 1760–1769 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  14. I. Itzkan, L. Qiu, H. Fang, M. M. Zaman, E. Vitkin, and L. T. Perelman, “Confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopic microscopy monitors organelles in live cells with no exogenous labels,” PNAS 103(44), 17255–17260 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  15. M. Xu, T. T. Wu, and J. Y. Qu, “Unified Mie and fractal scattering by cells and experimental study on application in optical characterization of cellular and subcellular structures,” J. Biomed. Opt. 13(3), 024015 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  16. K. Sung, “Fiber optic confocal reflectance microscopy: in vivo detection of pre-cancerous lesions in epithelial tissue,” PhD Dissertation, Univ. Texas at Austin (2003).
  17. H. Subramanian, P. Pradhan, Y. Liu, I. R. Capoglu, and V. Backman, “Optical methodology for detecting histologically unapparent nanoscale consequences of genetic alterations in biological cells,” PNAS 105(51), 20124–20129 (2008).
  18. L. T. Perelman et al., “Observation of periodic fine structure in reflectance from biological tissue: a new technique for measuring nuclear size distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(3), 627–630 (1998). [ISI]
  19. R. Drezek, A. Dunn, and R. Richards-Kortum, “A pulsed finited-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for calculating light scattering from biological cells over broad wavelength ranges,” Opt. Express 6(7), 147–156 (2000). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  20. H. Subramanian, P. Pradhan, Y. Liu, I. R. Capoglu, J. D. Rogers, V. Backman, “Partial-wave microscopic spectroscopy detects subwavelength refractive index fluctuations: an application to cancer diagnosis,” Opt. Lett. 34(4), 518–520 (2009). [MEDLINE]





ADVERTISEMENT