Measurement of magnetic penetration depth and superconducting energy gap in very thin epitaxial NbN films
Source: Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 072509 (2010); doi:10.1063/1.3314308
Published 17 February 2010
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
We report the evolution of the magnetic penetration depth (
) and superconducting energy gap (
) in epitaxial NbN films with thickness (d) varying between 51–3 nm. With decrease in film thickness Tc and
(0) monotonically decreases, whereas
(0) monotonically increases. Our results show that while the values of
(0) and
(0) are well described by Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer theory, at elevated temperatures, films with d
6.5 nm show sudden drop in superfluid density associated with the Kosterlitz–Thouless–Berezinski transition. We discuss the implication of these results on the time response of superconducting bolometers made out of ultrathin NbN films.
©2010 American Institute of Physics
) and superconducting energy gap (
) in epitaxial NbN films with thickness (d) varying between 51–3 nm. With decrease in film thickness Tc and
(0) monotonically decreases, whereas
(0) monotonically increases. Our results show that while the values of
(0) and
(0) are well described by Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer theory, at elevated temperatures, films with d
6.5 nm show sudden drop in superfluid density associated with the Kosterlitz–Thouless–Berezinski transition. We discuss the implication of these results on the time response of superconducting bolometers made out of ultrathin NbN films.
©2010 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 1 December 2009; accepted 20 January 2010; published 17 February 2010 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/96/072509/1 |
REFERENCES (19)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- P. Khosropanah, J. R. Gao, W. M. Laauwen, M. Hajenius, and T. M. Klapwijk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 221111 (2007)
- M. Tarkhov, J. Claudon, J. Ph. Poizat, A. Korneev, A. Divochiy, O. Minaeva, V. Seleznev, N. Kaurova, B. Voronov, A. V. Semenov, and G. Gol'tsman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 241112 (2008)
- S. P. Chockalingam, M. Chand, J. Jesudasan, V. Tripathi, and P. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. B 77, 214503 (2008).
- Z. Wang, A. Kawakami, Y. Uzawa, and B. Komiyama, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 7837 (1996)
- A. M. Finkel'stein,
Physica B 197, 636 (1994) . - A. F. Hebard and A. T. Fiory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 291 (1980)
- S. J. Turneaure, T. R. Lemberger, and J. M. Graybeal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 987 (2000).
- A. J. Kerman, E. A. Dauler, W. E. Keicher, J. K. W. Yang, K. K. Berggren, G. Gol'tsman, and B. Voronov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 111116 (2006).
- M. Chand, A. Mishra, Y. M. Xiong, A. Kamlapure, S. P. Chockalingam, J. Jesudasan, V. Bagwe, M. Mondal, P. W. Adams, V. Tripathi, and P. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. B 80, 134514 (2009)
- S. J. Turneaure, E. R. Ulm, and T. R. Lemberger, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 4221 (1996)
- For our coil configuration, the induced supercurrent at the edge of the film is two orders of magnitude smaller than the peak supercurrent density.
- R. C. Dynes, V. Narayanamurti, and J. P. Garno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1509 (1978).
- While NbN is in the strong coupling limit with 2
/kBTc~4.2, we do not observe a significant deviation in
(T) from weak coupling BCS behavior. - S. Kubo, M. Asahi, M. Hikita, and M. Igarashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 258 (1984)
- M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1996).
- This should be contrasted with granular samples where long wavelength phase fluctuations can give rise to linear decrease of superfluid density at low temperatures, e.g., G. Lamura, J. -C. Villégier, A. Gauzzi, J. Le Cochec, J. -Y. Laval, B. Plaçais, N. Hadacek, and J. Bok, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104507 (2002).
- T. P. Orlando, E. J. McNiff, S. Foner, and M. R. Beasley, Phys. Rev. B 19, 4545 (1979).
- D. R. Nelson and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1201 (1977).
- L. Benfatto, C. Castelani, and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117008 (2007)
J. J. A. Baselmans, A. Baryshev, S. F. Reker, M. Hajenius, J. R. Gao, and T. M. Klapwijk, ibid. 86, 163503 (2005).
S. N. Dorenbos, E. M. Reiger, U. Perinetti, V. Zwiller, T. Zijlstra, and T. M. Klapwijk, ibid. 93, 131101 (2008)
M. Ejrnaes, R. Cristiano, O. Quaranta, S. Pagano, A. Gaggero, F. Mattioli, R. Leoni, B. Voronov, and G. Gol'tsman, ibid. 91, 262509 (2007).
D. E. Oates, A. C. Anderson, C. C. Chin, J. S. Derov, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 43, 7655 (1991)
R. Hu, G. L. Kerber, J. Luine, E. Ladizinski, and J. Bulman,
B. Komiyama, Z. Wang, and M. Tonouchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 562 (1996).
ADVERTISEMENT


