Multipartite bound entanglement and multisetting Bell inequalities
Source: Phys. Rev. A 80, 032330 (2009); doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032330
Published 28 September 2009
Dür [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230402 (2001)] constructed N-qubit bound entangled states which violate a Bell inequality for N
8, and his result was recently improved by showing that there exists an N-qubit bound entangled state violating the same Bell inequality if and only if N
6 [Phys. Rev. A 79, 032309 (2009)]. On the other hand, it has been also shown that the states which Dür considered violate Bell inequalities different from the inequality for N
6. In this paper, by employing different forms of Bell inequalities, in particular, a specific form of Bell inequalities with M settings of the measuring apparatus for sufficiently large M, we prove that there exists an N-qubit bound entangled state violating the M-setting Bell inequality if and only if N
4.
©2009 The American Physical Society
8, and his result was recently improved by showing that there exists an N-qubit bound entangled state violating the same Bell inequality if and only if N
6 [Phys. Rev. A 79, 032309 (2009)]. On the other hand, it has been also shown that the states which Dür considered violate Bell inequalities different from the inequality for N
6. In this paper, by employing different forms of Bell inequalities, in particular, a specific form of Bell inequalities with M settings of the measuring apparatus for sufficiently large M, we prove that there exists an N-qubit bound entangled state violating the M-setting Bell inequality if and only if N
4.
©2009 The American Physical Society
| History: | Received 7 May 2009; published 28 September 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v80/e032330 |
REFERENCES (21)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1056 (1999).
- S. Ishizaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 190501 (2004).
- K. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160502 (2005).
- L. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 150501 (2006).
- D. P. Chi, J. W. Choi, J. S. Kim, T. Kim, and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032306 (2007).
- R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
- M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 574 (1997).
- S. Lee, J. Joo, and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012311 (2007).
- W. Dür, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230402 (2001).
- S. Lee, J. Lee, and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 79, 032309 (2009).
- D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, J. Chen, and C. h. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052309 (2002).
- A. Sen(De), U. Sen, and M. Żukowski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062318 (2002).
- K. Nagata, W. Laskowski, and T. Paterek, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062109 (2006).
- W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3562 (1999)
- W. Dür and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022302 (2000).
- J. A. Smolin, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032306 (2001).
- R. Augusiak and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 74, 010305(R) (2006).
- K. Nagata, Phys. Rev. A 76, 024101 (2007).
ADVERTISEMENT


