Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse

Recovering part of the boundary between quantum and nonquantum correlations from information causality

Source: Phys. Rev. A 80, 040103(R) (2009); doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.040103

Published 14 October 2009

KEYWORDS and PACS
Keywords
PACS
  • 03.65.Ud
    Entanglement and quantum nonlocality
  • YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef APS
Jonathan Allcock,1 Nicolas Brunner,2 Marcin Pawlowski,3 and Valerio Scarani4
1Department of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, United Kingdom
2H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, United Kingdom
3Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Gdansk, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland
4Centre for Quantum Technologies and Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543 Singapore, Singapore
Recently, the principle of information causality has appeared as a good candidate for an information-theoretic principle that would single out quantum correlations among more general nonsignaling models. Here, we present results going in this direction, namely, we show that part of the boundary of quantum correlations actually emerges from information causality. ©2009 The American Physical Society
History: Received 16 July 2009; published 14 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v80/e040103

REFERENCES (28)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. L. Masanes, A. Acin, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012112 (2006).
  2. J. Barrett, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032304 (2007).
  3. H. Barnum, J. Barrett, M. Leifer, and A. Wilce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 240501 (2007).
  4. V. Scarani et al., Phys. Rev. A 74, 042339 (2006).
  5. J. Barrett, L. Hardy, and A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).
  6. A. Acin, N. Gisin, and L. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120405 (2006).
  7. P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110402 (2009).
  8. G. Brassard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006).
  9. N. Brunner and P. Skrzypczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 160403 (2009).
  10. N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180502 (2007).
  11. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
  12. J. Barrett et al., Phys. Rev. A 71, 022101 (2005).
  13. M. Navascues, S. Pironio, and A. Acin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401 (2007).
  14. S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022110 (2006)
  15. J. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 230406 (2002).
  16. see also A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012113 (2005).
ADVERTISEMENT