Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse

Entanglement entropy in the O(N) model

Source: Phys. Rev. B 80, 115122 (2009); doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115122

Published 23 September 2009

KEYWORDS and PACS
Keywords
PACS
  • 05.30.-d
    Quantum statistical mechanics
  • 03.67.Mn
    Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations (quantum information)
  • YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef APS
Max A. Metlitski,1 Carlos A. Fuertes,2 and Subir Sachdev1
1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
2Instituto de Física Teórica IFT UAM/CSIC, Facultad de Ciencias C-XVI, C.U. Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain

It is generally believed that in spatial dimension d>1, the leading contribution to the entanglement entropy S=−tr rhoA log rhoA scales as the area of the boundary of subsystem A. The coefficient of this “area law” is nonuniversal. However, in the neighborhood of a quantum critical point S is believed to possess subleading universal corrections. In the present work, we study the entanglement entropy in the quantum O(N) model in 1<d<3. We use an expansion in epsilon=3−d to evaluate (i) the universal geometric correction to S for an infinite cylinder divided along a circular boundary; (ii) the universal correction to S due to a finite correlation length. Both corrections are different at the Wilson-Fisher and Gaussian fixed points, and the epsilon-->0 limit of the Wilson-Fisher fixed point is distinct from the Gaussian fixed point. In addition, we compute the correlation length correction to the Renyi entropy Sn=(1/(1 - n))log tr rho<sub>A</sub><sup>n</sup> in epsilon and large-N expansions. For N-->[infinity], this correction generally scales as N2 rather than the naively expected N. Moreover, the Renyi entropy has a phase transition as a function of n for d close to 3. ©2009 The American Physical Society
History: Received 28 May 2009; revised 12 August 2009; published 23 September 2009
Permalink: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v80/e115122

REFERENCES (29)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008).
  2. L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. H. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin, Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986).
  3. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666 (1993).
  4. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  5. D. V. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124025 (2006).
  6. E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050404 (2006).
  7. B. Hsu, M. Mulligan, E. Fradkin, and E.-A. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115421 (2009).
  8. A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. B 69, 224416 (2004).
  9. E. Fradkin, D. A. Huse, R. Moessner, V. Oganesyan, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 69, 224415 (2004).
  10. M. Vojta, C. Buragohain, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15152 (2000).
  11. M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 77, 054411 (2008).
ADVERTISEMENT