Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse

Selective and efficient quantum process tomography

Source: Phys. Rev. A 80, 032116 (2009); doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032116

Published 24 September 2009

EDITORIALLY RELATED
  1. Selective and Efficient Estimation of Parameters for Quantum Process Tomography
    Ariel Bendersky, Fernando Pastawski, and Juan Pablo Paz
    Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 190403 (2008)
KEYWORDS and PACS
Keywords
PACS
  • 03.65.Wj
    State reconstruction, quantum tomography
  • 03.67.Pp
    Quantum error correction and other methods for protection against decoherence
  • YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef APS
Ariel Bendersky,1 Fernando Pastawski,2 and Juan Pablo Paz1
1Departamento de Física, FCEyN, UBA, Pabellón 1, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
2Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany

In this paper we describe in detail and generalize a method for quantum process tomography that was presented by Bendersky et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 190403 (2008)]. The method enables the efficient estimation of any element of the chi matrix of a quantum process. Such elements are estimated as averages over experimental outcomes with a precision that is fixed by the number of repetitions of the experiment. Resources required implementing it scale polynomially with the number of qubits of the system. The estimation of all diagonal elements of the chi matrix can be efficiently done without any ancillary qubits. In turn, the estimation of all the off-diagonal elements requires an extra clean qubit. The key ideas of the method, which is based on efficient estimation by random sampling over a set of states forming a 2-design, are described in detail. Efficient methods for preparing and detecting such states are explicitly shown. ©2009 The American Physical Society
History: Received 9 June 2009; published 24 September 2009
Permalink: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v80/e032116

REFERENCES (24)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. Shabani and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100402 (2009).
  2. A. Bendersky, F. Pastawski, and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 190403 (2008).
  3. M. Mohseni and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170501 (2006).
  4. M. Mohseni and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. A 75, 062331 (2007).
  5. M. Silva, E. Magesan, D. W. Kribs, and J. Emerson, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012347 (2008).
  6. J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, J. Math. Phys. 45, 2171 (2004).
  7. C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012304 (2009).
  8. J. Lawrence, C. Brukner, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032320 (2002).
  9. J. P. Paz, A. J. Roncaglia, and M. Saraceno, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012309 (2005).
ADVERTISEMENT