Home | About Journal | Web Links | E-mail Alerts | RSS RSS Icon | Browse
Previous Article Next Article

Pulsed laser noise analysis and pump-probe signal detection with a data acquisition card

Source: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 123108 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3669783

Published 16 December 2011

KEYWORDS and PACS
Keywords
PACS
  • 42.62.Eh
    Metrological applications of lasers
  • 85.60.Dw
    Photodiodes; phototransistors; photoresistors
  • 42.79.Hp
    Optical processors, correlators, and modulators
  • 32.80.Xx
    Atomic level crossing and optical pumping
  • 85.60.Gz
    Photodetectors
  • 84.40.Ua
    Telecommunications: signal transmission and processing; communication satellites
  • YEAR: 2011
RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
PUBLICATION DATA
ISSN:
1553-9601 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP
Christopher A. Werley, Stephanie M. Teo, and Keith A. Nelson
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
A photodiode and data acquisition card whose sampling clock is synchronized to the repetition rate of a laser are used to measure the energy of each laser pulse. Simple analysis of the data yields the noise spectrum from very low frequencies up to half the repetition rate and quantifies the pulse energy distribution. When two photodiodes for balanced detection are used in combination with an optical modulator, the technique is capable of detecting very weak pump-probe signals (DeltaI/I0 ~ 10−5 at 1 kHz), with a sensitivity that is competitive with a lock-in amplifier. Detection with the data acquisition card is versatile and offers many advantages including full quantification of noise during each stage of signal processing, arbitrary digital filtering in silico after data collection is complete, direct readout of percent signal modulation, and easy adaptation for fast scanning of delay between pump and probe. ©2011 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 14 October 2011; accepted 26 November 2011; published 16 December 2011
Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3669783

REFERENCES (15)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. E. P. Ippen and C. V. Shank, Appl. Phys. Lett. 27, 488 (1975).
  2. S. D. Brorson, J. G. Fujimoto, and E. P. Ippen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1962 (1987).
  3. D. H. Auston and M. C. Nuss, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 184 (1988).
  4. M. H. Vos, F. Rappaport, J.-C. Lambry, J. Breton, and J.-L. Martin, Nature (London) 363, 320 (1993).
  5. S. Ruhman, A. G. Joly, and K. A. Nelson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 460 (1988).
  6. M. Lim, T. A. Jackson, and P. A. Anfinrud, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5801 (1993).
  7. N. C. J. van der Valk, T. Wenckebach, and P. C. M. Planken, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 622 (2004).
  8. O. B. Wright, B. Perrin, O. Matsuda, and V. E. Gusev, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024303 (2008).
  9. H. E. Lessing and A. von Jena, Chem. Phys. Lett. 42, 213 (1976).
  10. G. D. Goodno, G. Dadusc, and R. J. D. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 1791 (1998).
  11. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).
  12. A. Yariv, Introduction to Optical Electronics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971).
  13. P. A. Temple, Am. J. Phys. 43, 801 (1975).
  14. J. A. Valdmanis, G. A. Mourou, and C. W. Gabel, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-19, 664 (1983).
  15. A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, and S. H. Nawab, Signals and Systems, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1997)

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.
ADVERTISEMENT