where W1BG is the weight of the bottle and fluid remaining after the flow stops. The subscript 1 anticipates use of this equation in a later section. The original bottom of the plastic bottle was cut off, the bottle was inverted, and the tube was placed near the bottom of the uniform diameter portion of this reservoir. Another piece of stirrer was used at the open end to maintain a constant geometry of the flexible plastic when supporting the amount of filled fluid. A data-sampling rate of one point/s was used for all experiments. where N10 is the number of parent nuclei at t = 0, the time at which no daughter nuclei are present. For the readily available 137Cs beta decay to an excited state of 137Ba (respective half-lives of 30.2 y and 2.55 m), the much longer parent half-life means that where the final equilibrium value of N2 is written as N2f = N10 where W2f = W10 This third member is represented in our experiment by a third plastic bottle without an outlet. We model the time dependence of its weight as where W3BG is the weight of the empty third bottle. The time dependence for the weight of the second bottle is modeled by Eq. (3) and is written as where W2BG is the starting weight of the second bottle. For three cases of interest, a) References
Stephen J. Fairman received a B.S. physics education degree from Edinboro University of Pennsylvania and is currently teaching physics at Clarion Area High School in Clarion, PA. Joseph A. Johnson is attending Edinboro University of Pennsylvania in the B.S. physics education program. Thomas A. Walkiewicz, professor of physics, has taught at Edinboro University since 1970. He received a B.S. degree from Xavier University (Ohio) and a Ph.D. from The Pennsylvania State University. He has collaborated on experimental nuclear physics research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for more than 25 years and has served as a consultant to industry for studies of radiation effects in materials. He was co-founder and vice president of Edinboro Scientific Company, a certified radon testing lab, and has served on the TPT Editorial Board.Department of Physics and Technology, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, PA 16444; walkiewicz@edinboro.edu Fig. 1a. Weight vs time (black dots) for simple exponential decay plus a constant background. Red dots are calculated from Eq. (2) for Solver best-fit values ofW10 = 4.825, Fig. 1b. The same data and fit, but with the background term subtracted for both, shown on a log-linear scale. First citation in article Fig. 2. Weight vs time (black dots) for the secular equilibrium buildup analogue of a relatively short-lived daughter. Red dots are calculated from Eq. (5) for Solver best-fit values of W2f = 1.274, Fig. 3. Apparatus for the decay chain experiment consisted of three plastic bottles, each suspended from its own force probe. Coauthors (L to R) Joseph Johnson and Stephen Fairman. First citation in article Fig. 4. Weight vs time (black dots) for the three-member series decay chain. Red dots are calculated from Eqs. (2), (8), and (7) for member #1, #2, and #3, respectively, using Solver best-fit values of W10 = 6.212, Up: Issue Table of Contents
(P1 P2)r4/8
L, where Q is the volume flow per unit time, r is the radius of the tube of length L, (P1 P2) is the pressure difference between the two ends of the tube, and
is the coefficient of viscosity of the fluid. When one end of the tube is placed at depth h below the surface of the open vertical column of fluid of density
cross section A, the pressure difference is simply
gh when the other end of the tube is open to atmosphere. By applying the continuity equation where the volume flow rate at the top of the vertical column is expressed as Av = Adh/dt, where v is the instantaneous speed, it is readily found that the height of the column is given by h = h0exp(
t), where h0 is the column height above the tube at a reference time of t = 0 and Exponential Decay Experiment
1, and W1BG. For instructional and analysis purposes the data were imported into a spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel was used in this study) and sliders were constructed for each of the three parameters so students may study how a variation of each parameter affects the mathematical fit to the data. Students are asked to first find the best visual fit by manipulating the sliders, and finally to use Excel's Solver5 add-in tool to obtain the final best fit shown in Fig. 1. Solver is an optimization tool that we used to minimize the sum of squares of differences between the data and the corresponding values obtained from Eq. (2). Figure 1(b) is the same data and fit shown on a log-linear scale but with the background term subtracted. The overlap of the two graphs demonstrates excellent agreement except for small differences at large times.
Figure 1a.
Figure 1b.
1 = 0.00642, a tube length L = 13.9 cm, a diameter of the reservoir = 6.81 cm, and known properties of the fluid (water was used in all experiments), the diameter of the stirrer was found to be 1.9 mm from Eq. (1), which is close enough for our purposes to a direct measurement of about 2.1 mm by using a folding micrometer. The hollow cross section of the stirrer was not uniform, but more closely resembled that of a cylindrical cavity with a thin solid rod attached to the inner surface. We don't know what effect this has on Poiseuille's equation. For quantitative purposes it would be best to use a uniform capillary tube, but this was not the intent of our experiment. However, we now simply use this experiment in various lab courses as a measurement of the effective inside diameter of the stirrer. In lab courses where statistical treatment of data is emphasized, students routinely determine the tube diameter to be within 0.1 mm of the directly measured quantity. Historically this experiment was used to measure the viscosity of various fluids.
t). The decay constant,
, represents the probability per unit time for a nucleus to decay and is related to the half-life, T1/2, the time for half of the original number of nuclei to decay, by
T1/2 = ln 2. In the fluid flow experiment the value for
may then also be determined from this relationship by measuring the time for some reference height of fluid to fall by a factor of two. Secular Equilibrium Experiment
1 and
2, respectively, the number of daughter nuclei at time t is given by the well-known result7
2>>
1, so Eq. (3) may now be written as
1/
2.
1/
2 and W2BG is the initial weight of the fluid and bottle before filling begins. Figure 2 presents both data and a graph of Eq. (5) using the best-fit values for the adjustable parameters of W2f,
2, and W2BG. Sliders for these parameters were again employed for instructional purposes, and the final best-fit values were also obtained by the use of the Solver add-in. This fit is in excellent agreement with the data for this example of secular equilibrium, and we disagree with the statement by Greenslade2 that the "analogue breaks down for large times." Although at this point we are only interested in a qualitative agreement between the data and the mathematical model, all best-fit adjustable parameter values are consistent with direct measurements of corresponding quantities.
Figure 2. Series Decay-Chain Experiment
3 = 0), the time dependence for the third member is found to be
Figure 3.
1, W1BG,
2, W2BG, and W3BG were provided by minimizing the sum of squares of differences between data and model values for all three data sets and relevant equations combined.
Figure 4. Further Analysis
2/
1)]/(
2
1). Although we haven't pursued this, the reader may wish to investigate what effect the inclusion of this condition in Solver may have on best-fit values.
1 <
2, as in our case studied above, then after a sufficiently large time, Eq. (3) reduces to
2 = 2
1, b)
2 < 2
1, and c)
2 > 2
1, it follows from Eq. (9) that after a large time a) N2 = N1, b) N2 > N1, and c) N2 < N1, respectively. From this analysis we understand what conditions must be met for whether or not the population of N1 crosses below that of N2 for large times. In our case studied above, the best-fit values result in
2/
1 = 1.85, so the model equations (less background terms) show a crossover. However, this ratio is so close to the threshold value of two that, combined with the different constant background terms, within the experimental and analytical uncertainties involved in such a complex situation, it is not obvious how the actual long-term data compare, even after background terms are subtracted. We suggest that readers may be interested in similar investigations, but for
2/
1 much different from the threshold value of two. Conclusion
REFERENCES
Citation links [e.g., Phys. Rev. D 40, 2172 (1989)] go to online journal abstracts. Other links (see Reference Information) are available with your current login. Navigation of links may be more efficient using a second browser window.
CITING ARTICLES
This list contains links to other online articles that cite the article currently being viewed.
T. T. Grove et al., Phys. Teach. 46, 369 (2008)
Rafael M. Digilov et al., Am. J. Phys. 73, 1020 (2005)
David A. Faux et al., Phys. Teach. 42, 488 (2004)
About the Author
FIGURES
Full figure (30 kB)
1 = 0.006422, and W1BG = 1.467. First citation in article
Full figure (22 kB)
Full figure (30 kB)
2 = 0.01513, and W2BG = 0.2091. First citation in article
Full figure (53 kB)
Full figure (29 kB)
1 = 0.007285, W1BG = 2.000,
2 = 0.01348, W2BG = 1.966, and W3BG = 2.786. First citation in article
Go to: Previous Article | Next Article
Other formats: HTML (smaller files) | PDF (454 kB)