REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
issues and events

Holt Holds onto Congressional Seat, Keeps Science in Politics

 

January 2001 page 25

Holt As Congressman Rush Holt (D-N.J.) looked at the final vote tallies in his unnervingly close reelection bid in November, his thoughts turned to measurement design theory and the role of noise in ballot tabulations. This was political science with a twist, because Holt is the Princeton University plasma physicist who won a seat in the House of Representatives in 1998, and he can't help but approach politics with a great deal of science. Vern Ehlers (R-Mich.) is the only other physicist in Congress.

Bumpersticker Holt kept his seat from New Jersey's 12th district by surviving a strong challenge from Republican Dick Zimmer, who had held the same seat for three terms in the early and mid-1990s. The 30 000 voters in the district gave Holt the victory by a mere 500 votes and, in an echo of the presidential drama in Florida, Zimmer insisted on a recount.

"Each day of the recount I gained votes and when the margin grew from about 500 to 750, he pulled the plug," Holt said of Zimmer. Holt said he has already drawn up legislation calling for a commission to come up with recommendations of ways to standardize voting procedures in federal elections. His goal, he said, is to come up "with a lower noise measurement system" for voters.

Beyond that, Holt said he wants to double federal nondefense R&D spending, make the R&D tax credit permanent, improve and expand programs for science and math education in the public schools, and rekindle the debate over the need for a progressive federal energy policy.

As he watched CNN coverage of the Bush­Gore battle in Florida, Holt explained the difference between hard science and political science: "In science you're supposed to follow the evidence wherever it leads and let the chips fall where they may. But where the chips fall is what politics is all about."

Jim Dawson

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Science with Soft X Rays
  • Disappearing atmospheric neutrinos don't seem to be turning sterile
  • Does Accelerator-Based Particle Physics Have a Future?
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved