REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
letters

Strings 2000's Top 10 Bemuse Belfast

October 2001 page 12

David Mermin is entitled to disagree with the list of top 10 questions in fundamental physics (Physics Today, February 2001, page 11), but I think he should at least attribute the list to the physicists who compiled it rather than to the New York Times.

The Strings 2000 conference was hosted by the University of Michigan in July of that year. The organizing committee, which I chaired, invited each participant to supply a question; the best 10 questions were chosen by a panel consisting of David Gross, Edward Witten, and me. More details, including names of the people responsible for the winning questions, may be found on the Web at http://feynman.physics.lsa.umich.edu/strings2000/millennium.html.

Incidentally, the list produced an unexpected reaction in the strife-torn city of Belfast, Northern Ireland. A local artist concluded that, instead of fighting each other, its citizens might better spend their time pondering deep thoughts. He posted plaques of the top 10 questions around the city at bus stops, in pubs, and elsewhere, much to the bemusement of the residents. See http://www.qub.ac.uk/mp/questions/index.html.

Michael Duff
(mduff@umich.edu)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor

Mermin replies:I cited the New York Times because it set me thinking about such lists by characterizing the questions as ones physicists (not just string theorists) would most like to know the answers to. When I submitted the column to Physics Today, they told me about the Web site. Visiting it, I learned that the Times, surprisingly, had got the 10 questions exactly right. Since I had made it clear that the questions originated with string theorists, I saw no reason to cite the Web site too. But visiting it again, I now note the heading "Physics Problems for the Next Millennium." So I was wrong to attribute this overstatement to the Times.

I also visited the Queen's University Web site recommended by Michael Duff and was pleased and surprised to find my own 10 questions listed alongside those of the string theorists. I have not noticed either set posted on the Lexington Avenue Subway, but I have not been down to the city in many months.

N. David Mermin
Cornell University
Ithaca, New York
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Physics and Archaeology
  • The Little Machines That are Making it Big
  • Physicist Arrested in Iran
  • After-Dinner Physics
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved