REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
books

The Dating Game: One Man's Search for the Age of the Earth

Cherry Lewis
Cambridge U. Press, 2000. $24.95 (253 pp.). ISBN 0-521-79051-4
October 2001 page 74

The beginning of the 20th century was a time of ferment in geology as it was in physics. Lord Kelvin had weighed in on the centuries-old debate about the age of Earth, and his estimates of 10 million to 100 million years were highly influential in educated secular society. The discovery of radioactivity abruptly revealed a flaw in Lord Kelvin's assumptions; it also provided the means to date rocks directly and thereby confront the problem empirically.

Arthur Holmes (1890-1965) played a leading role in these efforts over the first half of the 20th century. As early as 1910, Holmes's work suggested that Lord Kelvin was wrong by at least an order of magnitude, placing the young Holmes in the daunting position of challenging perhaps the most influential scientist of his time. By the time of his death, Holmes had added another order of magnitude to Lord Kelvin's error. In The Dating Game, Cherry Lewis chronicles Holmes's dogged pursuit, over five decades, of a quantitative geologic time scale. In the process, she provides unique insight into some intriguing digressions from this pursuit.

Holmes's early work was remarkable in that much of it was done before the theory of isotopes. Shortly after Bertram B. Boltwood's discovery in 1907 that uranium decayed slowly to stable lead, Holmes was smitten by the geological implications: they drove him to switch from physics to geology as a student at University College of London. By 1911, using only analytical chemistry applied to a few mineral samples, Holmes established a framework for the geologic time scale that turns out to have been uncannily accurate, considering the deficiencies of his approach. Without belaboring details of his experimental and theoretical approaches, Lewis reveals Holmes's continual updating of his methodology to match the blistering pace of discoveries in the new physics. After the discovery of the neutron and the recognition of isotopes, Holmes refined his computational approach. But he was no longer able to make the relevant laboratory measurements himself; he relied instead on collaborators at the Vienna Radium Institute and, eventually, on others. His reliance on better-funded colleagues abroad to provide data is well illustrated by his correspondence, notably with the eminent American experimentalist Alfred Nier. Holmes's nearly lifelong financial struggles, exemplified by his storied plea for funds to buy a calculating machine, are a continuous theme.

Lewis deftly highlights some of Holmes's significant contributions to Earth science, such as his precocious advocacy of continental drift, including a proposal for mantle convection, and some of his ideas about using isotopes as tracers of geologic processes. Holmes's work in these areas is less widely known than his seminal work in geochronology, and Lewis thus makes an important contribution by documenting them. Holmes's impact as an educator is also given just acclaim; his textbook, Principles of Physical Geology (Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1944), was perhaps the most popular introductory text on Earth science ever published.

The picture of Holmes that emerges is curiously schizophrenic: on the one hand a scientific visionary and pedagogical leader, on the other a daring adventurer making extended forays to exotic lands (Mozambique and Burma, in mineral exploration and petroleum production respectively) to ease chronic financial need. These diverse dimensions of Holmes's personality and their interplay with events of his times are the distinctive emphases of this biography. For example, Holmes's extramarital romance with the irascible Doris Reynolds (also a geologist, and leading proponent of the ill-fated theory of "granitisation"), and the disapproving reception this relationship received at the staid University of Durham, emerge among the factors that led to his acceptance of the Regius Professorship that took him to the University of Edinburgh.

Lewis's book is accessible to anyone with a high-school physics and chemistry background. It provides unique insight into the life and times of a man who was indisputably one of the three most important figures in Earth science of the last century. The book may disappoint those who seek much depth in the evolving physics employed by Holmes and his contemporaries, but this was clearly not Lewis's aim in writing it. It makes lively reading and is recommended as an absorbing historical biography.

Paul R. Renne
University of California, Berkeley

 

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Physics and Archaeology
  • The Little Machines That are Making it Big
  • Physicist Arrested in Iran
  • After-Dinner Physics
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved