REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
letters

On Keeping Chinese Science Students

November 2001 page 81

I'd like to add to the story by Lynley Hargreaves (Physics Today, May 2001, page 24) on the dropout rate among Chinese physics PhD students. I am the chair of the graduate admissions committee in chemistry at Colorado State University. Since 1991, I have noticed similar trends among our chemistry students from the People's Republic of China. Like many state schools, CSU has significantly different tuition for resident versus nonresident graduate students. This is a cost that the department or the research advisor's grants must bear. Along with the costs, we are also concerned about teaching assistants' English language skills. Consequently, only 10 to 20% of our incoming graduate student classes comprise foreign students: 4 to 8 out of 30 or 40 new grad students per year. A significant number of students have dropped out of chemistry, to the advantage of our computer science program.

We have recently taken steps to select top chemistry students from the PRC who will want to stay in chemistry. We look for students who have been involved with undergraduate research and have published on chemistry-related topics. These two elements usually indicate students who are finishing a master's degree. We also call prospective students and interview them individually to determine their intentions. They are usually (though not always) forthright, and their interest in remaining in chemistry can be ascertained. When possible, we also call the student's adviser for additional information.

Generally, Graduate Record Exam scores are a very poor indicator of a student's future performance. We have found that undergraduate research experiences are the best indicator of both a student's performance and his or her dedication to a chosen science.

Building relationships with departments in the PRC is critical to developing the kind of openness one needs to accurately evaluate students. It's not always obvious how to do that except to take the first step. Careful selection of students and careful mentoring once they are here are the best solutions to this problem.

Peter K. Dorhout
(pkd@lamar.colostate.edu)
Colorado State University
Fort Collins
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Physics in a New Era
  • Understanding Why Sound Waves Travel Faster along Earth's Axis in the Inner Core
  • As Decision Time Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repository, a Mountain of Issues Still Unresolved
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved