REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

Moving Through Curved Spacetime

November 2003, page 12

More on Early LEDs

In their article "The Promise and Challenge of Solid-State Lighting" (Physics Today, December 2001, page 42), Arpad Bergh, George Craford, Anil Duggal, and Roland Haitz show a graph (page 43) of performance of light-emitting diodes as a function of time. The graph obscures the early history by suggesting that GaP:Zn,O devices first appeared in 1968, whereas by that time a number of manufacturers had them on the market. The breakthrough in gallium phosphide came in 1962 when Jerzy Starkiewicz and I discovered that good red emission required both zinc and oxygen to be present, and we mapped the appropriate concentration ranges.1 That work allowed for the development of devices (we called them "crystal lamps") with sufficient reproducibility for manufacture. They were described in March 1962 in a journal that was restricted at the time, and a more complete description was given in the open literature later that year.2

Sample devices were sent to potential military users in May and June 1962. The response was enthusiastic, so toward the end of the year, a proper production line was set up in Phil Gurnell's semiconductor device group in the Services Electronics Research Laboratory in Baldock, England. One application was a film marker for Royal Air Force reconnaissance planes: An array of emitters put digital information about flight parameters onto each frame of the film. Obviously the array had to be small so that the marker used up very little of the frame. For that, the encapsulated lamps were 1/32 inch (just under 1 mm) in diameter and were mounted within the thickness of a printed-circuit board. That application was secret at the time but was later made public.

References

1. J. Starkiewicz, J. W. Allen, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 881 (1962).
2. J. W. Allen, J. R. Nav. Sci. Serv. 17, 72 (1962); New Sci. 15, 43 (1962); Instrum. Pract. 16, 1463 (1962).

John W. Allen
(jwa@st-andrews.ac.uk)
University of St. Andrews
Fife, Scotland
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Nuclear Bunker Busters, Mini-Nukes, and the US Nuclear Stockpile
  • The Growth of Astrophysical Understanding
  • The Business of Academic Physics
  • Physics Salaries Rise
  • No Time to Be Brief: A Scientific Biography of Wolfgang Pauli
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
    • Related from the archive
    • The Force Need Not Be With You: Curvature Begets Motion

    Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved