REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
letters

Hiroshima Bomb's Explosive Yield Less than Reported

 

 

February 2003 page 14

Paul Guinnessy reports that the explosive yield of the Hiroshima bomb was 20 kT (Physics Today, August 2002, page 23 ). However, that value is at variance with the most reliable ones in the open literature, in which one typically sees values of 12.5 to 15 kT.1 The comprehensive calculation by John Malik gives the value of 15 kT, with an error of 20%.2

The 20-kT value was initially given by President Harry S. Truman in August 1945. Physicists at Los Alamos knew it was an overestimate that was based, perhaps, on information Truman had from the Trinity test. But the Trinity test data were for a different type of bomb--a plutonium implosion device, not the uranium gun-type model that was used on Hiroshima.

References

  • 1. L. Badash, Scientists and the Development of Nuclear Weapons, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J. (1995), p. 54; S. Hoddeson et al., Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos during the Oppenheimer Years, 1943-1945, Cambridge U. Press, New York (1993), p. 392; R. Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Simon & Schuster, New York (1986), p. 711.
  • 2. J. Malik, The Yields of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Nuclear Explosions, technical rep. no. LA-8819, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex. (September 1985).
Henry E. Heatherly
(hen5820@louisiana.edu)
University of Louisiana
Lafayette
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Bubble Puzzles
  • Younger Speaks From the Frontline of Defense
  • Arrogance—A Dangerous Weapon of the Physics Trade?
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved