In his article on rapid climate change (Physics
Today, August 2003, page 30), Spencer Weart incorrectly
credits Willi Dansgaard’s Danish team for
augering the first deep ice core to reach the bottom of
an active ice sheet from Camp Century, Greenland. This
honor rests with B. Lyle Hansen and associates Herbert
Ueda and Donald Garfield from the US Army Corps of
Engineers’ Cold Regions Research and Engineering
Laboratory in Hanover, New Hampshire. In July 1966,
after a five-year field effort, they reached a depth of
1387 meters.1 One of us (Langway) was responsible for
developing the international study program for the Camp
Century ice core.2
The Hansen crew also drilled the
second ice core ever to reach bottom ice, in January
1968, at a depth of 2164 meters, from Byrd Station,
Antarctica.1 Both core drillings were extensions of
the successful US International Geophysical Year
projects in Greenland and Antarctica (1957–58) to
deep-core drill into polar ice sheets for scientific
purposes.3 The IGY studies were proposed,
initiated, and led by Henri Bader, chief scientist,
under an interagency agreement with NSF.
It was data obtained in these
early drilling projects that ultimately led to the
discovery of rapid climate changes and served as the
foundation and justification for the follow-up
international, multidisciplinary Greenland Ice Sheet
Program by researchers from the US, Denmark, and
Switzerland.4,5 It was also during the final three
years (1979–81) of the GISP 10-year field and
laboratory investigation that Danish drilling
participants, led by Niels Gunderstrup and Sigfus
Johnson, augered the 2037-meter-deep third ice core to reach the bottom of the ice sheet at Dye-3, in August 1981.
References
1. H. T. Ueda, D. E. Garfield, Drilling Through the Greenland Ice Sheet, special rep. no. 126, US Army Corps of Engineers’ Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH (1968); Core Drilling Through the Antarctic Ice Sheet, technical rep. no. 231, USACE CRREL, Hanover, NH (1969).
2. C. C. Langway Jr, B. L. Hansen, Bull. At. Sci. 26(10), 62 (1970).
3. H. Bader, United States Polar Ice and Snow Studies in the International Geophysical Year, American Geophysical Union monograph 2, AGU, Washington, DC (1958), p. 177; C. C. Langway Jr, Stratigraphic Analysis of a Deep Ice Core from Greenland, research rep. no. 77, USACE CRREL Hanover, NH (1967); H. Bader, Scope, Problems, and Potential Value of Deep Core Drilling in Ice Sheets, special rep. 58, USACE CRRELHanover, NH (1962).
4. C. C. Langway Jr, H. Oeschger, W. Dansgaard, eds., Greenland Ice Cores: Geophysics, Geochemistry, and the Environment, Geophysical monograph 33, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC (1985).
5. H. Oeschger, C. C. Langway Jr, eds. The Environmental Record in Glaciers and Ice Sheets, Dahlem Workshop rep. no. 8, March 1988. Wiley, Berlin, Germany (1988).
Weart replies: Historians should work hard to be
accurate, and the same applies to those who would
criticize historians. What I actually wrote, and which
is true, was that in the 1970s the most convincing
evidence for rapid climate change came from an ice core
drilled by Willi Dansgaard’s Danish group in
cooperation with Americans led by Chester Langway Jr. I
never said that theirs was the first deep core. The
constraints of a brief article, which attempted to
cover a great deal of ground, left no space to describe
how the drilling campaign was but one stage in a
prolonged effort of heroic proportions—an effort
that began in the 1950s and continues today. (Attentive
readers might have noticed brief mentions in my photo
captions.) I have written more about the drilling
campaign in the essay cited in the article, available
at http://www.aip.org/history/climate/rapid.htm.
Those interested in ice drilling history are also urged
to review and contribute to the additional but fragmentary
information collected at http://www.aip.org/history/sloan/icedrill.
I am glad that Langway and
Johannes Weertman have taken the trouble to draw
attention to early deep ice drilling developments.
Those named in their letter, and the many other
institutions and people who contributed to that
important task, deserve more recognition than they have
received.