One of the most important skills for scientists regardless
of gender is giving lectures. Public speaking is a
learned skill that requires practice, effort, and
confidence building. Lectures are a tremendous opportunity
to communicate accomplishments to other scientists
and to influence scientific discovery.
Aim for your audience
When preparing your presentation, it is important
to decide what you would like your audience to remember
after it is over. Some people are very good at listening
and will hear and understand every sentence you utter.
Most people, including me, lapse in and out of attention
during a presentation. One way to reach those with
questionable listening talent is to outline your main
points up front, when the audience is still awake.
Then, spend the body of the talk explaining the main
points, being sure to take sufficient time to explain
each graph, picture, or idea. End with your conclusions,
which reiterate the main points you want to get across;
keep them all on the same visual if possible. Each
visual should be self-contained and self-explanatory,
since some people who don’t listen well can
and will read everything on the slides. The labels
on all plots should be large enough and the symbols
defined well enough that the person who returns to
consciousness in the middle of your description of
the plot can attempt to catch up with you. Make sure
your list of conclusions is still visible at the end
of the talk, which you end by saying, “I will
end there,” or “Are there any questions?”
Many people in the audience are going to search themselves
for questions at this point, and the conclusions will
jog their memories as to what you have said. The list
aids in the formulation of questions; the questions
and answers are an important component of the talk.
Beginning speakers should practice their talks before
giving them—once for hour-long talks, three
times for 20-minute talks, and 12 times for 5-minute
talks. You should practice your talk once in front
of friends or coworkers who can offer you constructive
suggestions. Avoid being defensive if there is criticism,
and revise your talk in any way you think is beneficial.
These practice talks are often more difficult than
the public talk because you feel silly explaining
your project to a group of people who know most of
the information already, but they are an important
part of the learning process.
Many seasoned physicists finish working on their
talks the night before or on the plane headed to the
conference, but they only get away with this after
long practice. Good speakers make all of their most
important points in the alloted time, with sufficient
time left over for questions. The shorter the talk,
the more planning is required. If the presentation
is being made with transparencies, the important points
can be written on Post-It notes attached to each vue-graph
as a reminder. PowerPoint images can be printed out
in thumbnail size with reminders written next to each
image. Alternatively, you can write your points on
3 × 5 cards and hold them in one hand.
Always test your visuals before the presentation
to allow time for changes if necessary. If possible,
the visuals should be tested in the same room and
with the same equipment with which the presentation
will be given. Photographs are often difficult to
see on overhead transparencies and black transparencies
heat up quickly. Computer-projected (for example,
PowerPoint) images often have different colors on
your laptop than from a projector, and innumerable
technical problems can be encountered with connection
cords, screen resolutions, operating system incompatibilities,
movies that will not load or play, and so on. Sometimes
conference organizers request an electronic copy of
the talk ahead of time so it can be loaded into the
local equipment. Sometimes the speaker brings the
talk on her own laptop. As a backup, always have copies
of computer-projected talks on separate electronic
media (CD, memory clip, and so on) or available for
electronic transfer over the World Wide Web. Alternatively,
the most important visuals can be printed out as transparencies.
If you are traveling to speak, your talk should come
with you in your carry-on luggage.
Now hear this
The first thing that happens when you stand up to
speak is that the organizer or session chair hands
you a microphone. Women typically do not have deep
booming voices that carry over lecture halls, and
should use amplification at every opportunity; there
is nothing worse than preparing and delivering a great
but inaudible lecture. Some microphones come with
an alligator clip that is designed to attach to the
front of a button-down shirt such as most men wear
when giving talks, and a battery pack clips to the
pocket, belt, or pants waist that male speakers wear.
Women who are not prepared for the audio assistance
often start their talks with an awkward exchange with
the session chair while they try to Figure out how
to attach the audio apparatus.
In most cases, it is acceptable to wear anything
from jeans and a T-shirt to a stylish suit with a
skirt. Clothing should be carefully chosen to be comfortable
and to accommodate a microphone. If you wear a skirt
or pants made of a sturdy fabric, then you have a
waistband on which the battery pack can be clipped.
When speaking, I usually wear a wool or cotton skirt,
a cotton button-down shirt, and a jacket or vest.
If the alligator clip cannot be attached to my shirt
for any reason (old-fashioned styles can only be clipped
in the direction that men’s shirts button),
it can be clipped to the jacket or vest. Fashion boots
can be easily worn with a skirt and, if chosen well,
are a comfortable and secure alternative to heels,
which are a trip hazard when you are nervous and need
to walk on polished floors crisscrossed with temporary
wiring. You should not wear distracting clothing when
giving a talk. After all, you are already the focus
of attention and you would like to have the audience
concentrate on the physics.
Young women often make the mistake of beginning
their talks with an apology or self-deprecating comment
of some sort. I once saw a young woman deliver a prize
lecture for a national astronomy award. In her first
sentence, she declared that the judges had made a
big mistake in choosing her for the award. Although
I think this was intended partly as a joke, it also
showed her recognition that research results come
from the combined work of many minds and fingers.
As women, we tend to see scientific endeavor as a
web of activity, and to work in groups to accomplish
a common goal. It is somewhat foreign for us to think
about distinguishing ourselves—moving ourselves
up through a ranking or pecking order. Do give credit
to your collaborators, but do not do it at your own
expense. This is your chance to shine.
Be confident
The confidence with which you present your material
is very important to your success in communicating
your ideas. Although it is somewhat taboo for women
to assert or assume they know everything, it is a
sign of weakness for men to question their own abilities.
If a woman shows through her words and manner that
even she does not believe in her own abilities, then
a man will find it quite reasonable that he should
not believe in them either. Listen to yourself when
you practice the talk, and make sure you sound confident.
Then carry that confidence with you into the question-and-answer
period.
For the beginning speaker, the prospect of a question
can be daunting. No one, even the most expert researcher
in your particular area, will know the answer to every
question. What is important in the question session
is to make sure you understand the question—sometimes
by repeating it, to think about what you know about
the answer, and to answer it as fully and correctly
as you can.
I have been asked what the size scale of an image
that I am presenting is, or how long it takes for
a dwarf galaxy to orbit around the Milky Way, or what
a quasar consists of, and I have answered, “I
don’t know.” Big mistake. While it is
okay to say “I don’t know” in an
offhand way that communicates “It is not important”
when asked a detailed question about a fine point
you have not thought about, everyone will learn more
if you tell the audience what you do know about the
question. The person who asked what the scale of my
image was did not care whether it was 5 arcminutes
or 10 arcminutes, but would have been happy to know
that it was at least not arcseconds or degrees. I
did know that it was a piece of a 13-arcminute image,
but I did not know how big the piece was, so I simply
said, “I don’t know.”
In that same lecture, a physicist asked me what a
quasar was. Now, of course, I knew that most astronomers
think a quasar is a black hole with matter falling
into it from an accretion disk, and that for some
reason it is ejecting charged particles along its
magnetic poles. But I haven't critically reviewed
the literature, and I do not understand the physics
of how gravitational potential energy from matter
falling into the black hole from the accretion disk
is channeled into charged particles spewing out of
magnetic poles. So my first reaction was to say, “I
don’t know.” I then realized that was
the wrong answer, and communicated my description
of a quasar while waving my hands around and saying
it was a hand-waving answer. The audience learned
more about my incredible ability to lose confidence
in myself than about the physics of quasars.
Whatever the question, it can be answered with respect
and dignity, to the fullest extent you know the answer,
and without apology for those parts you do not know
or techniques you have not tried. If a question is
very detailed or in your opinion is not of general
interest to the audience, you can offer to answer
a complex question in person after your talk. However,
do not overuse this response because it could be interpreted
as “I don’t know.”
Try your best, and do not worry if you do not get
everything exactly correct. It is an advantage of
your colleagues that they do not remember ever having
been wrong. I learned a lot about the male mind one
day from my husband, who is also a scientist. He was
pouring water from a plastic bottle into a glass,
and when setting down the bottle, he managed to knock
both the glass and the bottle off the kitchen table.
He caught the glass before it fell, but the bottle
and its contents spilled out onto the floor. He turned
to look at me and said, “Hmm, it's a good thing
I noticed that the bottle was plastic and saved the
glass instead, or we would have had broken glass on
the floor.” No time lost there on regrets.
And keep smiling. After all, your subject really
is interesting, and fun.
The author acknowledges helpful comments on this
essay from Tim Beers, Katie Freese, Ingrid Wilke,
three anonymous women physicists, and in particular
Tim McKay.
Heidi Newberg
is an associate professor of physics at Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York.