The article "Dusty Plasmas in the Laboratory, Industry, and Space," by
Robert Merlino and John Goree (Physics Today, July 2004, page 32) was interesting, informative, and well written. However,
allow me to correct three statements. Although they are admittedly
not central to the point of the article, it would be a shame
to misinform readers with outdated information.
Recent results by Michael Gadsden1 and by Sheila Kirkwood and
Kerstin Stebel2 show that the apparent increase in the observed
frequency of noctilucent clouds over the past 30 years does
not hold up to rigorous reanalysis of the observations. I concede
that the belief in the increased frequency was widespread until
August 2002, but it is wrong. The occurrence of these clouds
does exhibit an apparent anticorrelation with the solar cycle,
but their minimum occurs before the sunspot maximum. Whether
the correlation is real or coincidental is still under study.
There is no linear trend in the occurrence of noctilucent clouds.
Among hundreds of published temperature measurements taken
near the high-latitude mesopause in summer, only one has been
as cold as 100 K. To my knowledge, even the author who published
that measurement no longer quotes it. Consensus among scientists
working in the field is that noctilucent clouds occur when
the temperature at an altitude between 80 and 88 km drops below
150 K, which occurs often at high latitudes in summer. The
average mesopause temperature at high latitudes is near 128
K. Even that value is rather sensational, the coldest temperature
on or near Earth.
It is completely new that water vapor released
at high altitudes tends to collect near the poles, and such
a statement should not be published without proof or reference.
The global circulation in the summer stratosphere and mesosphere
is upward and slightly poleward.3 The large-scale, long-term
average upward motion is a consequence of acceleration by breaking
buoyancy waves. Through adiabatic cooling, the updraft leads
to the cold temperatures that create the noctilucent clouds.
The water vapor content in the mesosphere is difficult to measure,
but appears to be near 5 parts per million by volume in summer
at high latitudes.4 The source of the vapor is still under
study. Michael H. Stevens and coauthors have published one
slightly elevated water vapor observation in the high- latitude
mesosphere,5 which may be a plume from a space shuttle launch.
It is unlikely that any significant portion of observed noctilucent
clouds should be due to shuttle launches, as those clouds have
been observed since 1884.
References
1. M. Gadsden, "Statistics of the Annual Counts of Nights on Which NLCs Were Seen," Paper given at the Mesospheric Clouds 2002 meeting in Perth, Scotland, 19-22 August 2002, Memoirs British Astron. Assoc. , vol. 45, Aurora Section.
2. S. Kirkwood, K. Stebel, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8440 (2003) [SPIN].
3. World Meteorological Organisation, Atmospheric Ozone 1985, WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project rep. no. 16, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland (1985).
4. C. Seele, P. Hartogh, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1517 (1999) [SPIN].
5. M. H. Stevens, J. Gumbel, C. R. Englert, K. U. Grossmann, M. Rapp, P. Hartogh, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1546 (2003) [SPIN].