REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   E-MAIL ALERTS   |   HELP |   SIGN OUT    

Home   |   Print edition   |   Advertising  |   Buyers Guide   |   Jobs   |   Events calendar   |   RSS feeds
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

Einstein, Masers, and Lasers: Asking New Questions

February 2006, page 11

The link between Albert Einstein's 1916 proposal of downward stimulated atomic transitions and the development in the 1950s and 1960s of masers and lasers using stimulated emission is often noted and the question sometimes asked: Why did it take so long? The more interesting question might be, Did Einstein think that his proposed transitions represented a linear amplification process for the stimulating light? At that time, would he have encountered an amplifier of any kind? More broadly, would he or any physicist of that era have any familiarity with the basic concept of "coherent" amplification at any frequency, much less the concepts of feedback and coherent oscillation? Vacuum tubes had just begun to be explored; radio technologies used essentially incoherent spark-gap transmitters and crystal detectors; and stereo systems were far in the future. Insights on these queries from anyone familiar with Einstein's writing and thinking could be quite interesting.

Anthony Siegman
(siegman@stanford.edu)
Stanford, California

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Printer-friendly formatPrinter-friendly format
  • Download PDFDownload PDF
  • E-mail this articleE-mail this article
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Stronger Future for Nuclear Power
  • Astro Turf: The Private Life of Rocket Science
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Month-long calculation resolves an 82-year-old quantum paradox
    September 2009
  • Friction, force chains, and falling fruit
    September 2009
  • US electricity grid still vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses
    September 2009
  • A ghost image violates a Bell inequality
    August 2009
  • Request product info

     

     


    SERVICES
    Physics Today Jobs
    Physics Today Buyers Guide
    Research Today
    NEWS
    News Picks
    We Hear That Society News
    Event Calendar
    Obituaries
    THE MAGAZINE
    This month in print
    Past Issues
    Institutional subscriptions
    Information for advertsers
    READER SERVICE
    Register
    Sign in
    Subscribe
    Email alert
    MORE INFO
    Contact us
    About Physics Today
    Privacy Policy
    Terms & Conditions
    Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved