According to ’t Hooft the combination of quantum mechanics and gravity requires the three‐dimensional world to be an image of data that can be stored on a two‐dimensional projection much like a holographic image. The two‐dimensional description only requires one discrete degree of freedom per Planck area and yet it is rich enough to describe all three‐dimensional phenomena. After outlining ’t Hooft’s proposal we give a preliminary informal description of how it may be implemented. One finds a basic requirement that particles must grow in size as their momenta are increased far above the Planck scale. The consequences for high‐energy particle collisions are described. The phenomenon of particle growth with momentum was previously discussed in the context of string theory and was related to information spreading near black hole horizons. The considerations of this paper indicate that the effect is much more rapid at all but the earliest times. In fact the rate of spreading is found to saturate the bound from causality. Finally we consider string theory as a possible realization of ’t Hooft’s idea. The light front lattice string model of Klebanov and Susskind is reviewed and its similarities with the holographic theory are demonstrated. The agreement between the two requires unproven but plausible assumptions about the nonperturbative behavior of string theory. Very similar ideas to those in this paper have long been held by Charles Thorn.

1.
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, Utrecht Preprint THU-93/26, gr-qc/9310006.
2.
C. Thorn, in Sakharov Conference on Physics, Moscow, Vol. 91, pp. 447–454.
3.
L.
Susskind
,
Phys. Rev. D
49
,
6606
(
1994
).
4.
J. D.
Bekenstein
,
Phys. Rev. D
49
,
1912
(
1994
).
5.
I.
Klebanov
and
L.
Susskind
,
Nucl. Phys. B
309
,
175
(
1988
).
6.
C. Misner, K. Thome, and J. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1970).
7.
J.
Kogut
and
L.
Susskind
,
Phys. Rep.
8
,
75
(
1973
).
8.
R.
Perry
and
K.
Wilson
,
Nucl. Phys. B
403
,
587
(
1993
).
9.
J.
Kogut
and
K.
Wilson
,
Phys. Rep. C
12
,
75
(
1974
).
10.
L.
Lipatov
,
JETP Lett.
59
,
596
(
1994
);
A. H. Mueller, CU-TP-640, n.d. (94) hep-th/9408245.
11.
R. P. Feynman, Third Topical Conference in High Energy Collisions of Hadrons, Stony Brook, NY, Sept. 1969.
12.
J. D.
Bjorken
and
E.
Paschos
,
Phys. Rev.
185
,
1975
(
1969
).
13.
J. D. Bjorken, International Conference on Duality and Symmetry in Hadron Physics, Tel Aviv, 1971.
14.
J.
Kogut
and
L.
Susskind
,
Phys. Rev. D
9
,
697
,
3391
(
1974
).
15.
G.
Altarelli
and
G.
Parisi
,
Nucl. Phys. B
126
,
298
(
1977
).
16.
M.
Karliner
,
I.
Klebanov
, and
L.
Susskind
,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
3
, (
1988
).
17.
G. Veneziano, DST workshop on Particle Physics: Superstring Theory, Kanpur 1987, edited by H. S. Mani and R. Ramachandran (World Scientific, Singapore), p. 1;
Superstring ’89 Workshop, Texas A&M University, edited by R. Arnowitt et al. (World Scientific, Singapore), p. 86, and references therein.
18.
A. Mezhlumian, A. Peet, and L. Thorlacius, String Thermalization Near a Black Hole Horizon, preprint SU-ITP-94–4, NSF-ITP-94–17, February 1994, hep-th/9402125.
19.
J. Preskill and G. ’t Hooft (private communication).
20.
D. N.
Page
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
71
,
1291
(
1993
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.